HC Judge repeated from Nandi Case, a fine of CM RS 5L – News2IN
Kolkata

HC Judge repeated from Nandi Case, a fine of CM RS 5L

HC Judge repeated from Nandi Case, a fine of CM RS 5L
Written by news2in

Kolkata: Calcutta High Court Judge Causik Chanda on Wednesday was soaked from the Minister of Bengal Mamata Banerjee’s Peticy on the BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari Vickory Nandigram minister, but also demonstrated Rs 5 Lakh to “firmly” calculate the psychological and vilification adopted to seeking “.
Cm Banerjee accused the petition that legal judges were long with BJP legal cells and took cases for the party to propose “biased concerns” and that “the court must be like Caesar’s wife, above suspicion”.
Chanda Judge said he had “no personal tendency to Hearing this case “also did not have” hesitant to take the case “but he still chose to restugate because” the two people involved in this case belonged to the highest state of politics “.” Some opportunists have emerged …
on behalf of saving justice , These mongers will try to keep controversy staying alive and creating newer controversies.
Test the case before this bench will be a tool to deviate themselves.
It will conflict with the interests of justice if an unwarranty fight continues together with the trial, “said the judge.
The fine of RS 5 Lakh must be paid to the West Bengal Bar Board to help the supporters of the supporters who lost their lives for Covid, he ordered.
CM Banerjee did not respond to fine .
“This is the sub-also problem.
I will not talk about this.
The lawyers will make a decision, “he said.
But other Trinamool leaders and the BJP IT cell heads rose to Twitter after order.
Trinamool Rajya Sabha Leader and spokesman for Derek O’Brien, without directly referring to the assessment, Tweeted:” We live and learn , We live in a world where the truth costs are now equipped with a surprising price label: Rs 5 Lakh.
We live in a world where propaganda and falsehood are also stacked.
Price: free.
Get a reference? Modi Hi to Mumkin Hai.
Go figure.
“Trinamool Lok Sabha MP Mahua Moitra, which includes the Chanda Judge’s case has appeared for BJP as a lawyer mentioned in the command of Justice Chanda, tweeted:” The best petulance today.
Realizing there was no way out but for his own recession he decided to slap ₹ 5lakh well just because he could.
It’s rather like a teacher realizes true students & breaks blackboard.
“BJP leader Amit Malviya, however, feel fines are” small quantities “.” The good thing in Banerjee to show judges in bad light is a small amount, given the potential of actions and his words to cause erosion of ordinary people’s beliefs in our institutions.
He also has an EC that is slandered during the election, “he tweeted.
Judge Chanda said in his order that he did not agree with the cm petition that” long, close, close, personal, professional, money, and ideological “with political parties raises” conflict of interest ” .
“Almost impossible in this country to get someone who might not be said to have a political view.
Anyone who is interested in politics can be said to have ‘interest’.
Like other citizens in the country, a judge also trained voting rights for political parties but set aside individual accidents while deciding on the case, “he said.” The association of the past from a judge with political parties by itself cannot form a bias fear.
This proposition, if left accepted, will damage the idea of ​​deep rooted neutrality associated with the justice delivery system and leads to unfair bench hunting practices, “the judge wrote in his order.
Justice Chanda also refers to the arrest of Banerjee CM bias since he objected to confirmation As a permanent judge of Calcutta HC.
“The applicant cannot seek researchers based on his own approval or objections in connection with the appointment of judges.
A judge cannot be said to be biased because of the perception and action of the opponent.
Very ridiculous to believe that the applicant will expect a profitable order from a judge whose appointment he agreed and vice versa, “said the command.
He did not realize that the letter was written to the chairman of the judge who was seeking the assignment of the case when he first took the trial at 18 June, said Justice Chanda, added: “The script has been prepared; Personal drama is ready to launch a drama that is well trained outside the Court.
“He then went to quote Tweet Trinamool MPS Derek and Mahua Moitra.” The chronology of the event “suggested” that accidental and conscious efforts were made to influence my decision before the reconist application was placed before me for judicial considerations on June 24, “he said.

About the author

news2in