Mumbai: The Bombay High Court on Monday seeks details of the CBI investigation has so far become a corruption case, against the former Minister of State House Anil Deshmukh on Tuesday.
Repeating that the investigation intended to instill public trust must “oppose all involved”, HC again asked whether Mumbai police officers in the panel for the recovery of former Police Inspector Assistant Waze Sachin could claim his immunity because he did not know his controversial pasture.
“Corruption is the root cause because the system is paralyzed.
There is nothing to be abandoned and everyone must be investigated,” said Judge S Shinde and N J Jamadar.
“If we arrive at the root of this problem, Waze is collecting money.
So who is behind his recovery? Can someone now say that he is not aware of Waze’s past, notes etc.? That is why we say again and again that this episode is not one People.
The essence of the HC sequence (April 5th directed a preliminary investigation into the allegations of ‘corrupt malpractice’ made by former Police Chief Mumbai Bir Singh on March 20 because it was annexed in complaints submitted by the Advocating Jaishri, “they added.” Repetition, we say the investigation must oppose everything involved.
The normal way is that as long as everything goes well, no one says anything.
After the transfer occurs, all kinds of accusations are made, “said the bench while concluding Deshmukh’s request to find the Arrangement of the FIR CBI against it .
Additional lawyer General Secret Lekhi, CBI advice, said Deshmukh Buk’s behavior An part of his official duty because he was suspected of asking Waze to raise money from restaurants and bars and no sanctions or previous agreements for the CBI investigation.
For Deshmukh, senior adviser Amit Desai argued that previous sanctions were very important in the provisions of the prevention of the Corruption Court.
Lekhi said the previous sanctions clause was not intended to protect errors.
“The Minister of Home Affairs (Deshmukh) gives a target to raise money to abort.
This is not the duty of the Minister to give a target to police officers.
This case is maladministration and margovernance.” CBI’s advice said “no one” outside the probe purview.
HC looks for Dishmukh probe details from CBI
