Nagpur: Nagpur bench Bombay High Court on Wednesday refused to hear the application of alleged maiost sympathizers and lawyers Surendra Gadling from the city in the case of burning in 2016 where around 80 vehicles were burned on the Surjagarh mining site in the district.
“We have the view that the court seeks to break the second schedule of Nia Act to be a special court as referred to as Part 22, the person who is harmed by the Guarantee Rejection command is required to appeal below Section 21 (4) of the same action.
The application below part 439 from the code Criminal procedures cannot be maintained before HC, “the division bench consisting of Judge Vinay Deshpande and Amit Borrow.
While removing the application, the bench praised the petitioner of the opportunity to utilize the recovery of the appeal of legislation under Section 21 (4) of the laws of Nia if permitted in law and subject to limits.
Gadling has filed a guarantee through Senior Adviser Subodh Dharmadhikari, where he prayed to register his case before the HC division bench instead of Single.
After the arrest of the Petitioner, Police Wishramgarh from Pune looked for his house in the city and seized some burdensome materials, including documents, hard disks and pen drives.
Two letters written to him by Teltumde Maois Maois who were feared and Sympatrizer Varavara Rao also recovered.
More letters from Maois senior, where they resembled Gadling for failing to secure a guarantee for the professor of the University of Delhi GN Saibaba, also found from his home.
HC ‘no’ to hear Plea Gadling guarantees in the case of combustion
