Nagpur: In a big assistance to Ms.
Reddy, suspended APCCF and former Field Director of the Matghat Tiger Reserve (MTR), the Nagpur bench from the Bombay High Court has canceled the FIR registered by Dharni police on RFO suicide cases.
Harisal RFO Chavan has committed suicide on March 25, 2021, by shooting himself with his service revolver, accusing suspension if the Vinod Shivkumar officer from abuse.
Along with Shivkumar, the first accused, Reddy’s name was also added as a second defendant.
Reddy, who was arrested and then given a guarantee by the High Court on May 3, has submitted a criminal writing petition that seeks the termination of FIR.
Even though fir was canceled, he continued to be suspended and the investigation of discipline was underway.
The suspension is expected to be revoked now.
Deciding on Thursday, justice as Chandurkar and Justice Ga Sanap, after justifying the material collected by the police, decided that there was no legal base to involve the applicant in the crime under the part 306 IPC.
Arguing on the behalf of Reddy, Senior Senior Advisor SV Manohar and As Manohar said this case was basically based on three suicidal records and in the example, it was clear that the deceased had been specifically called Shivkumar, which was accused of being the only person responsible for committing suicide.
Although there are some references to the applicant in a suicide note, it can be seen that the deceased has harmed the trust in the applicant and has written that every time the applicant is around, he feels confident.
“Even though in some places it was taken into account that the applicant did not take any action against the Shivkumar to hold it from carrying out various illegal actions, it was conveyed that the statement for the effect on the record could hardly be a reason to continue the placement for the Petitioners under Section 306 IPC, “Manohars argued.
Instead, the SS Jachak application appeared for the respondent’s police against the termination of FIR.
According to Jachak, the deceased on various occasions had made complaints with Reddy about the defendant Shivkumar but the first failed to take any action.
“This inaction in the Petitioner part number illegal negligence that has encouraged the deceased to commit suicide,” he said.
Abhay Sampre, advice for the husband of the deceased Rajesh Rajesh Mohite, too argued that the applicant indirectly blocked his wife who was late than submitting a written complaint against Shivkumar, despite the fact that he filed the first charge.
However, after hearing all parties, the court said in the case of alleged suicidal reduction, there must be evidence of direct and indirect incitement acts on the commission of suicide.
“Only on charges of harassment without any positive actions directly to the time the incident in the defendant’s lead or forcing the person to commit suicide will not be enough,” court court.
“From this case it became clear that alleged mere abuse of the deceased by others would not be sufficient unless there was such an action in the defendant who forced the person to commit suicide.” Suicide records and other materials collected by the prosecution were all short to hold the applicant responsible Because it was demanded under the 306 part of the IPC, “court court.
Welcoming the HC decision, EX-APCCF SS Mishra said,” Things are politicized against Reddy.
Some NGOs and forest unions consider it as a golden opportunity to grind ax because Reddy has shown them the door to their interests.
So the first thing to do the Department of Forest is to make it immediately restored.
“