Chennai: Madras High Court on Tuesday recognized and ordered notifications to pills from the service organization and also the powerful DMK legislator, who tried to declare the non-constitutional SEC.
57 Constitution (42nd Amendment) ACT 1976, as far as it took the field of education from a list of countries to the list of the co-trade union government.
After signing the Government of Tamil Nadu as a party respondent in the case by itself, the first bench Head of Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice P Daudikesavalu ordered notifications, returned in eight weeks, to the state and central government.
The problem will be taken to hear after 10 weeks, Bench said.
In his pill, DMK MLA Dr.
N ezhilan, a medical practitioner and guardian about ‘Aram Seyya Virumbu Trust’, challenged by the Sec.
57 Constitution (42nd amendments) acting so far removing 11 entries from list II and transferring the subject contained in the entry from the list of countries to the simultaneous list as part of the federal structure.
He proposed that the reason behind giving exclusive authority to countries about the problem of “education” driven by the fact that it is a country that knows individual needs and people’s aspirations in various fields / regions and are better placed to overcome the gap in the system and formulate policies made specifically according to their needs.
The frace constitution, in constituent assembly, debates whether the subject must be included in the union list, list together or list of countries and after a thorough discussion, the Assembly has rejected all the amendments proposed and found assistance in the argument that ‘education’, especially the subject of the province / state and the state Do not interfere in this domain.
Safe! You have managed to throw your votelogin to see the same results, constituent assembly including “education” as an entry 11 in list II, making it in the only country domain.
The transfer of the subject ‘education’ from the list II to register III has resulted in breaking the intention of this constitutional maker and has damaged the federal structure, the applicant argues.
In advance, the 42nd amendment, as far as it takes exclusive executive / legislative rights of states and makes their status based on the Executive / Legislative Power of the United States, because it is a violation of the basic structure of Federalism and is responsible for being hit, the Petitioner said.