Prayagraj Revision: The High Court of Allahabad has rejected litigation of public interests (pills) who are looking for policy breakers to allow the sale of online liquor and shipments in Uttar Pradesh.
Destroying the Pil submitted by Gopal Krishna Pandey, a high court lawyer, a division bench consisting of Munishwar Acting Chairman Nath Bhandari and Justice Subhash Chandra Sharma observed, “Finding subject matter as a policy of the country, we do not tend to allow online sales of liquor.” Pills are submitted looking for directions to frame the policies needed for sending liquor houses.
Advice for the applicant handed over that the particular state government issued a notification to allow delivery of liquor online and thus home delivery will be made.
In observing observations carried out by the Supreme Court to the countries to consider non-direct sales, including delivery of online / home liquor to avoid density and to maintain social blasphemy norms in terms of Covid-19 guidelines.
This was conveyed that Madras High Court has allowed the sale of online liquor.
Chairperson of Counsel standing, representing the state government, opposes the petition and proposes that the prayer made is referring to policy decisions and now the government does not tend to allow the sale of liquor by sending home.
Permission to sell liquor online by several countries is in the Covid-19 era when it is at its peak and must avoid density in the shops.
There is no record to show density density in stores in the state of Uttar Pradesh and now the peak of Covid-19 and the second phase has been lost.
In pills, some reasons to allow sales are given as if liquor is sold online, sales will also increase and increase sales means increased income.
Second, the difficulty in determining the location of the store in accordance with the number of Uttar Pradesh and the location of excise rules, 1968 will be deleted.
In addition, there will be a low store maintenance fee for licensees of liquor stores.
Furthermore, senior citizens or others, who for any reason are known they avoid buying replies from shops, will also be facilitated.
In addition, above, unnecessary and non-social crowds that are usually collected around liquor stores will also decrease, as a result of law and order will also increase.
Reject all requests, the court said, “Applicants have shown concern to increase state revenue and other aspects that include the purchase of liquor even by those who may be ashamed to make purchases from the store.
The reasons given are not to avoid density or maintain social distance to follow The Covid-19 protocol, but for various reasons observed by the APEX court.
“The court delivered this decision on August 4.