Chandigarh: The Punjab High Court and Haryana have set aside the entire selection process and a list of achievements prepared by the Punjab government to appoint more than 2,300 teacher training teachers (ETT) in the state.
“The advertisement dated March 6, 2020, contains the election criteria that is reduced along with the entire selection process, including a provisional list for recruitment to the 2.364 ETT post which is canceled and set aside,” HC decided.
Safe! You have managed to throw your voteogin to see HC, however, observes that advertising offers can cause great difficulties for candidates who aspire to make questionable positions.
At the same time, it cannot be ignored that if the selection process initiated in ignoring the service rules is allowed to reach the finality, the same will perpoke illegality, the court added.
In the detail released on Tuesday, the Justice of Mahabir Singh Sindhu also argued that the selection criteria specified in the advertisement of the weight of five signs (maximum) for higher qualifications inherently cannot be cured with illegality.
Grouse Applicant opposes the criteria of higher education
However, considering the 4-rule, the selection must be made based on recommendations by “Board”.
On the other hand, the election process is being carried out by the recruitment directorate without legitimate authority, therefore, the whole exercise is carefully illegal, observing Sindhu justice.
HC passed this order when hearing the petition submitted by Daljit Kaur and others.
The applicant questioned the advertisement on March 6, 2020, issued by the state of Punjab inviting applications to fill some Post Teachers ETT.
A total of 2,364 candidates must be selected through this selection process.
Klausus 3 of the selection mode given ‘,’ explain that the written type of objective type 100 signs must be done and the final achievement list must be prepared based on written tests and after adding a sign for higher qualifications.
Advisers representing the applicant, Advocates Vikas Chatrrrath argues that the language used in the legal rule is not ambiguous and with the effect that the final election of the candidate must be based on their ability to be written and there will be no sign for Viva.
VOce or interview.
The posted post is regulated by the Punjab State Education (UP Cadre) of the Service Group’s Border ‘C’, 2018.
Amendment Rules are carried out through notifications on February 26, 2020, providing “no person appointed to service through direct recruitment unless he qualifies in competitive tests As determined by the director from time to time.
The final choice of candidates must be based on their services in the written exam.
There will be no sign for Viva Voce or interview.
”
Thus, the main belibis of the Petitioners controlled the advertising clause that gave different criteria to determine higher qualifications for candidates.
