SLUG: Proceedings Trial Stay Prayer: The High Court of Allahabad on Thursday Stayed the Varanasi Court Order on April 8, 2021, which directed the Indian Archaeological Survey (ASI) to ‘conduct a comprehensive physical survey of Kashi Vishwanath Temple (KVT) -yanvapi complex mosque and process Furthermore than this case.
Passing the Directive, Prakash Padia justice also gives three weeks to the central government and the state to submit their respective replies in this matter.
In the order of 26 pages, the court observed, “the judgment was reserved in all petitions that were delayed by this court, after hearing the advice of coaljar on March 15, 2021.
The court below has full knowledge of the fact that judgment has been booked on March 15, 2021.
In this view , the court below should not continue and decide on the application submitted by the Plaintiff in the original lawsuit for a survey by the Indian Archaeological Survey (ASI).
“” In the opinion of the court, the court below must wait for the verdict in the petition in front of this court and not Continuing further in this problem until the judgment is conveyed.
Judicial courtesy and decipations guarantee discipline as expected from the court below but for unexpected reasons, none of the courses are taken, “The court observed.
“It must be regrettable that the court under departing from this traditional way in this case and choosing to examine the question itself.
I have said so with the hope of affection that the judicial enthusiasm should not eliminate the expected depth responsibility of the court below,” The next court was added.
To remember, civilian division (Senior Division), the Fast Tribe (FTC) Varanasi has directed breast milk on April 8, 2021, to conduct a complex survey of the KVT-Gyanvapi Mosque to find out whether a temple was destroyed to build a mosque that stands there close to KVT .
In two separate petitions, the WAQF board of the Sunni Center and Anjuman Insezamia Mosque, Varanasi has challenged the Command Court Varanasi.
Previously at one stage, while appearing for one of the applicants, his advice had argued that a lawsuit in which the order of civilian judges (Senior Division), Fast Court (FTC) Varanasi (April 8, 2021) was under the challenge, it itself could not be maintained at under part 4 places of worship (specifically provisions) ACT, 1991, as a bar archiving bar or other legal processes in connection with the conversion of religious characters from every place of worship, which is available on August 15, 1947.
Therefore, there are no claims that can be made about existing religious sites on August 15, 1947.
According to the 1991 action, there is no help that can be sought to change the status of any religious place because there is on August 15, 1947, the Petitioner’s advice has argued and added, “Therefore the command to conduct a survey is illegal “.
The Petitioner’s advisor also argued that when the High Court had ordered his assessment of the maintenance issue of the settings mentioned above, the court below should not give any order in his suit until the coat maintenance problem was decided by the maintenance of the suit was decided by.
High Court.
However, the adviser who represented the temple believed that there was no temporary commandment in this court and only the judgment was reserved on March 15, 2021.
Thus, there were no events for the court below to delay hearing in this matter.
After hearing all the long sides, the court had booked orders on August 31, which was delivered today (September 9).