Nagpur: Agreement for sexual relations provided under the misunderstanding of the facts cannot be considered as free, the Nagpur bench from the Bombay High Court (HC) ruled while refusing a man’s complaint for pulling out his shot.
The police put on charges against a man with a complaint submitted by his ex-fiance, after being abandoned by him.
He collected Bhandara’s man to build physical contact with him at the forest resort on the promise of marrying him immediately.
“The facts stated in the Petitioner’s FIR and the behavior of the Petitioner clearly showed that his intention was scary.
He founded sexual relations against the will of Survivor by obtaining his appointment under the promise to get married.
Such approval cannot be said to be free.
The approval given is based on a misunderstanding It is not free, “the division bench consisting of Atul Chandurkar justice and Justice Govinda Sanap was held.
Observing the APPLICANT COCE action is not a simple cheating case, the bench said it was coupled with serious violations of rape.
“It can be collected based on the material accused of hiding his intention not to marry the girl so sexual lust is satisfied,” said the judges.
The objectives accused of violating in such cases must be collected from the totality of the facts …, the bench was added.
“Seeing the facts of the case from any corner, it shows that this is not a fit case for hairy fir,” said the judges.
After the couple got engaged on February 22, 2021, their marriage was repaired for April at Gadchiroli.
However, it was first postponed because of a pandemic and then because the girl signed Coronavirus.
The young man arranged a party at Karhandla resort in June, where he forced him to be drunk and at a guarantee that they would immediately tie the wedding knot.
He returned to take action in the morning with his agreement.
After the incident, young people began to avoid the girl, quoting compatibility issues.
Furthermore, the survivors of Gadchiroli filed a complaint of rape of young people, who knocked on the HC door, to eat it, argued that the accusation was reckless.