PANAJI: The Bombay High Court in Goa crashed into the government’s decision to order 41% of State Quota St, SC and OBC Category Course for Postgraduate Postgraduate Gave Medical College from 2021-22.
It also canceled the recommendations carried out by the Goa commission for ST and SC, and the Goa commission for OBC, supported the order.
The court argues that the recommendations of the two commissions “are a serious problem” and should be considered by the same level of seriousness.
The recommendation of the commission for SC / ST is responsible for being set aside because they are made “in a very hasty, casual and arrogant way, even without the resemblance of the application of the mind”, said the court.
“Recommendations are made without issuing notices to those who tend to be affected or in any case without disturbing to hear the state or more government version, especially the Dean of GMC and GDC,” the division bench consisting of Judge Mahesh Sonak and MS Jawalkar said.
More than 100 doctors have challenged the government’s decision to implement a reservation for the PG GMC course from the academic year 2021-22.
Lawande’s Petitioner lawyer said the state government had decided not to implement a reservation policy to PG in GMC and that for more than 14 years there was no reservation.
He said by doing this country has acted contrary to its own rules.
The court stated that the record showed many activities between February 20, 2020 and May 420.
On February 20, 2020, President Gomantak Dhangar Samajonatti Mandal Goa discussed the representation to the main minister for the Dhangar community for the Dhangar community for the PG course in GMC and GDC.
After that on May 4, 2020, the state government made a decision to order 41% of seats in the PG course from the 2021-2022 academic year.
“For three months, quite a rush of two complaints archived before the SC / SC commission and the OBC Commission, and the two commissions, almost two to three days from the receipt of the complaint, made their recommendations against the state government,” the court observed .