Thiruvananthapuram: MB Speaker Rajesh decides that the financial subject committee concerned has the right and strength to examine all KIIFB capital expenditure accounts.
Because detailed capital expenditure is not specifically mentioned as an item that must be examined by the subject’s committee concerned, the necessary changes must be made from next year and so on to register specifically, the speaker decides after considering a point of order raised by former AP Minister of Anilkumar Finance (eight) was rejected the opportunity to examine the details of the Kiifb capital expenditure.
Anilkumar argues that the subject committee concerned was rejected the opportunity to examine the details of the Kiifb expenditure because the house had issued an observation of the CAG audit on Kiifb.
Even though the chair on July 4, 2019 decided that the KIIFB audit report must be available for the supervision of the study committee concerned, there were no steps taken to ensure the same thing, the former minister had shown.
The speaker said that the house did not reject observations of CAG, but only criticized several observations by CAG.
Although there are enough provisions that empower the study committee concerned to call and examine the details of Kiifb’s expenditure, the head of capital expenditure is not specifically included in the subject committee supervision schedule.
In the light of the booking point, the chair decided that all the details were under the expenditure of head – capital – must be specifically listed in the supervision schedule for the inspection of the study committee concerned.
TNN.