Chandigarh: While giving a guarantee to several SanSa farmers who were ordered to the sighthous cost of the Haryana police for allegedly attacking Ranbir Singh Gangwa, the local court in Sanda had observed that “the incitement commission in this case was doubtful”.
According to the judge, at least made an effort to carry out guilty murders who did not number murder interested in this case.
“After hearing rival satisfaction, I have given wise consideration for the same thing.
The incitement violation commission under the Section 124-A IPC in this case is doubtful as the advisor is indicated for applicants.
I am satisfied with his opinion of advice for the appreciators who are least offended Under Section 308 (an effort to commit a guilty murder) IPC is interested in this case, “observes the judge.
Rajesh Malhotra, Judge Session Sirs have passed this order while providing guarantees to five farmers, Sahab Singh, Daljit Singh, Balkar Singh, Mitta Singh and Balkaur Singh, all the different residents in the villages in the Si Sire District.
The main accusation is that they have attacked the representative of the speaker vehicle and caused slogans against the government.
FIR is listed under various parts of the IPC including the ATTE MPT to kill under section 307 and incitement under the 124-A IPC section.
The FIR was registered against farmer leaders including Harcharan Singh Panjuana, Prahlad Singh Bharukhera and about 90-100 unknown protesters.
While it is very objected to the pleasure plea filed by these farmers, the Public Prosecutor opposes the application for regular guarantees on the soil which currently applicants along with other people who are not known to commit government serious violations.
And also made efforts to eliminate the deputy speaker Ranbir Singh Gangwa by throwing stones, injuring the police and damaged the official car representative of the speaker.
He was then delivered that although applicants currently not mentioned in FIR, they are clearly visible in various videos.
However, the adviser who represented the farmer handed over that they were involved and the incitement was not interested in the current case because there were no records that said the incident could cause the decline of the state government but section 124-A was added to increase gravity of alleged violations.
It was also submitted that serious incitement allegations could not be called in every situation without any threat that made sense for the state government.
It was also stated by the advice for farmers that the country’s machinery knew about farmers’ protests and warnings that they would not allow political functions at the university, but even then the representative of the speaker visited the university to incite the feelings of farmers who protested, which caused the incident.
Farmer advice also stated that the protesters did not carry any weapons to hurt anyone, but the situation turned out to not heal because of some criminals to hurt the feelings of farmers by Ranbir Singh Gangwa, who led the BJP Camp worker at Chaudhary Devi Lal University (CDLU ) SANSA.
He further emphasizes that each educational institution cannot be used to disseminate the political agenda.