Humans get a 7-year prison position to exploit girls physically with the pretext of marriage – News2IN
Kanpur

Humans get a 7-year prison position to exploit girls physically with the pretext of marriage

Written by news2in

Kanpur: Additional Session Judge The Quick Track Court (Number 41) on Thursday sentenced one Dharmendra Vishwakarma to exploit a girl physically with the pretext of marriage and punish him with a 7-year prison sentence with a fine of Rs 15,000.
The chairman of the chairman in order was increasingly observing that if the defendant failed to pay a fine, he had to suffer other prison terms from six months.
The period in which the defendant in prison will be adjusted in the term sentence.
According to the additional government advisors Vinod Tripathi and Indralata Shukla, complainants are victims themselves.
He has stated that he met a boy named Dharmendra, a resident of Arra Bingawan, who promised to marry her.
On February 3, 2013 his mother had visited Dharmendra’s residence and discussed marriage issues.
But Arvind Vishwakarma, brother Dharmendra demanded a number of Rs 5 lakh as dowry and in the absence of money there would be no marriage.
Moreover, he threatened that if this conversation was leaked, he and other family members could not get out of the house.
Arvind afterwards often visited his house and gave life threats.
ADGC states that during the trial, the victim has added that Dharmendra has established a physical relationship with him with the pretext of marriage and has exploited him several times in a different place.
The chairman of the chairman in the observation stated that prosecution had succeeded in proving that the defendant physically exploited the victim and seek his approval with the pretext of marriage.
There is no free agreement.
Allegations of dowry requests cannot be proven.
Therefore, accused of Arvind Vishwakarma and the others have been released from immerse accusations.
In quantum sentences, the defense begged that it was his first violation.
He is married and responsibility to his family.
Therefore, soft views must be adopted against it.
On the other hand, prosecution argued that the defendant had cheated and exploited a girl who was a serious violation of nature.
Therefore, he must be punished with a tight sentence.

About the author

news2in