Letter: Special Court for Children’s Protection for Sexual Violations (Pocso) ACT was awarded the death penalty on Tuesday to the convicted Guddu Yadav (35) for rape and murder of a two-year-old little girl in the Pandesara area.
On Monday, the local court announced an assessment in a short time of 21 days since the chargesheet was submitted.
The court ordered compensation of Rs 20 Lakh to the victim’s family.
The Judge Special Court for the Pocso Law, P S Kala, was sentenced by Yadav and the giving of the death penalty.
Previously, the court had completed the trial within five days and examined 42 witnesses.
In this case, the police have submitted a Chargesheet 264 pages on November 15 in seven days from the arrest of convicts.
The minor was kidnapped, raped and killed on November 4 and his body was found on November 7 the next day, Yadav was arrested by the police after his identity was developed based on CCTV footage.
“In a short time, the assessment has been announced.
The top courts, the government and the police are very concerned about such crimes and deals strictly with each case.
It is our priority to prevent the crime but if it will ensure our efforts to ensure our efforts to ensure efforts We.
The justice was presented earlier, “said Police Commissioner Ajay Tomar.
Police get various important scientific tests such as running style analysis, DNA profiles, viscera testing and CCTV recording analysis conducted in a short time.
The police also conducted crime reconstruction, test identification tests and witness recording statements under the CRPC 164.
The police examined the footage of more than 500 CCTV cameras in the area to get instructions and more than 200 police officers joined the investigation when minor kidnapping was reported.
“Prosecution argues that it is the rarest of rare cases and why the death penalty must be given.
It is a cruel crime and based on strong scientific evidence, the punishment was announced by the court,” said the Tree Government Government Nayan Sukhadwala.
Disclaimer: The identity of the victim has not been disclosed to protect his privacy in accordance with the direction of the Supreme Court about cases related to sexual violence