Chandigarh: The Punjab High Court and Haryana have directed the Punjab government that in the case of unnecessary delays in cases of members of parliament and MLA (former and sitting) countries, he can seek an explanation of the investigation officer concerned.
“We have taken a written statement and impressed at the Punjab investigation agent to ensure the completion of investigations quickly in all cases delayed.
In the case of this court found that there was an unnecessary delay, it would not have a choice but to seek an explanation of the investigation officer concerned, “Observe HC.
The division bench consisting of justice of Rajan Gupta and Justice Karamjit Singh gave this order while hearing ongoing pills regarding the disposal of pending criminal cases in the region against MP and MPA sitting and sitting.
During the hearing, continued with this case, the Punjab Government adviser SPS Tinna, additional advocate General Punjab, submitted that in the direction of the court, Inspector General of Police (IGP), Crime-II, investigation bureau, has been nominated as a Nodal Officer for a two-week review Criminal reviews are registered against MPS / MLAS (sitting or first) who are being investigated by the police and sincere efforts are being carried out to ensure the compliance of instructions issued by the Supreme Court and HC.
According to him, a letter has been written to the field unit in the Punjab state to ensure compliance.
Haryana Advice on the Government of Ankur Mittal, additional AG Haryana, told the HC that in cases where the investigation was delayed, the same thing was being reviewed by Nodal officers, Sanjay Kumar, IGP & Order (administration).
This is also being examined whether there is an undue delay in the investigation and the reason.
He assured the court that no further delay would be robbed by the state given the clear direction if tilted as Ashwani Kumar Upadhyay versus Indian and other unity.
Advocate Senior Sumeet Goel, while representing the CBI, gave details of several cases of CBI who were delayed against MP / MLA in Panchkula, Chandigarh and Mohali.
He also made a special reference for the registered FIR in 2011 against the Secretary of Parliament, Punjab, Raj Khurana (now died) in the case of grafting.
According to Goel, the trial in this case was waiting in a special court, Chandigarh but had not made progress despite being at the peak stage.
On this case, the bench asked the CBI Judge Special, Chandigarh, to submit a report on the reason for the delay concluded the trial in the case.
Representing the Government Government, additional lawyer General India Satya Pal Jain told HC about the Peniting case against Punjab CM Amarinder Singh in Ludhiana.
He submitted a status report on behalf of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) that a criminal case was institutionalized by Ed against Sukhpal Singh Khaira, sitting MLA.
HC was told that investigations in the case against Khaira were now detained considering the temporary direction given in the petition.
He also informed about staying in the case of ED against Bhupinder Singh Hooda.
The problem will now be heard on August 19.
The material problem is waiting before HC in Petition Suo Motu, where HC has been seeking details of Punjab countries, Haryana and UT Chandigarh about the suffering of cases against leaders in their respective countries.
HC has recognized this problem in following the direction of SC and appointed senior advocate of Khosla Rupinder as Amicus Curiae to help the matter.