Illegal residents of Khori Village in Faridabad moved the Supreme Court for rehabilitation

New Delhi: Facing the Demolition of their Unauthorized Houses Built on Aravali Forest Areas in Faridabad, Residents of Khori Village have approached the Supreme Court looking for their direction for their rehabilitation and challenging state government policies that only occupy those who have occupied land before 2003 Rehabilitated.
Asking for their right to an adequate shelter, Priwasae Sangshan Society Welfare moved SC through Mohit Paul’s advocate and argued that the exact rejection of rehabilitation of the occupants of Khori Gaon would make them homeless in this pandemic and seek court problems.
“Housing rights have been considered fundamental rights in Article 21 of India It is considered meaningless.
If the state of Haryana does not reopen the rehabilitation scheme, thousands of residents of Khori Gaon will be considered homeless and will not.
Enable to whatever benefits under the scheme, “the petition said.
Haryana’s Government Rehabilitation Policy, framed in accordance with the SC 19 command February 1920, provided for the rehabilitation of those who have lived in an invalid village before 2003.
The place present faces the demolition of houses in Khori Village settled afterwards 2010.
Move for sympathetic intervention The court, the applicant said that the majority of the residents of Khori Gaon Colony were employed in an unrolted sector, not receiving formal education, and thus did not have the awareness and resources needed to maintain the right documentation, especially those with returning.
Before 2004.
“This is conveyed that access to adequate housing can be a prerequisite for the enjoyment of some human rights, including the right to work, health, social security, voting, privacy, or education.
The possibility of income for living can be seriously disrupted when Someone has been moved after forced evictions to a place issued from employment opportunities.
With evidence of residency, homeless people may not be able to enjoy social services or receive health care, “said the petition.
“It is the responsibility of the court to reduce inequality and social imbalances by attacking laws that perpetuate them.
The right to life and the right to work integrated and interdependent and, therefore, if someone loses his job as a result of the eviction from the slums or sidewalks , the rights to live is considered.
The appropriate rejection of rehabilitation will be a deterrent to the interests of the occupant of Khori Gaon who will be considered homeless in this pandemic, “the petition said.