New Delhi: Worried of Invective, the two judges in the Supreme Court bench Dy Chandrachud and as Bopanna – created a type of type with the determination of hearing the case of the Krishna River water dispute only because they came from Maharashtra and Karnataka in this case apart from Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, Report Dhananjay Mahapatra.
Although the judges took an oath to make justice without “fear or assistance”, concerns over insulting or rude criticism imposed their placement of the case of Water Dispute Krishna.
“We do not want to be a target of information,” said Justice Chandrachud after consulting with Justice Bopanna, who argued that the judge who was placed thus has listened to the case of sensitive river water disputes.
That might be one reason researchers to avoid being accused of being biased by the old country while hearing the case as a judge of each from Maharashtra and Karnataka.
But, the real reason and directly behind the reconstruction is something else.
A few days before the scheduled hearing, the two judges were flooded with e-mail, which was explained by the judge to Ti as “terrible”, and the letters accused them of remembering the fact that they belonged to their state in the kristigation waters.
Upset in the tone and tenor of email and letters, the judges decided not to continue with hearing of disputes that were afraid of severe public reactions to be a benefit of their decisions.
Judge Chandrachud came from Maharashtra and Justice Bopanna from Karnataka.
Both Judge Chandrachud and Justice Bopanna every day hearing cases that have roots in their parents’ countries.
However, in India, Sahah Water River evokes high emotions, which often runs high to violate the legal embankment to become a kilkenny paint fight, both inside and outside the courtroom.
Krishna river water dispute has a box history for the past 14 years.
Telangana accused Karnataka using more than its part and divert water to various projects.
Karnataka said instead of wasted water by flowing to the sea, it is better to use it to be used in irrigation and charging dry areas.
Even though lawyers representing the countries ask the judges not to withdraw from hearing in the field that in the past they have heard it, the judges considered e-mail, letters and precedents of the past from the researcher of the judge (which is included in the water involved in water disputes) , stay firm in their view.
This email writing and flood the judges in the bench with insulting letters in front of an important audience in sensitive cases has become one of the aspects of the trend that emerged from the broken judge.
Former Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi has written about such efforts which made him during his term as CJI.
In his book, Judge Gogoi wrote, “The dangers of personal attacks on non-conformist judges are the biggest threat to the institution and in turn of the judicial democracy and independence.
On behalf of saving justice, there is a covert attack that can kill democracy …” “This is a real danger And even the Supreme Court is free from or immune to it.
It gets strength every day.
The danger of judges fell to prey on this single group consciously or unconsciously seriously.
Who does not want to leave the institution at the age of 65 without injury and with a commendable report card that will be circulated well? Judge must leave inheritance for the next generation who must live and work in the applicable ecosystem, “said former CJI in a profession.