In unusual steps, Calcutta HC files, special lives petitions – News2IN
India

In unusual steps, Calcutta HC files, special lives petitions

In unusual steps, Calcutta HC files, special lives petitions
Written by news2in

Kolkata: Angry people move the Supreme Court is normal, but not the Calcutta High Court itself submitted a special leave petition (SLP) in the APEX court.
The Calcutta High Court Administration moved the Supreme Court on Monday seeing specific guidelines on the role of the main justice administration or major justice of acting.
SLP was present in the number of July 19 by justice Sabya-Sachi Bhattacharyya questioned the way the case he heard was transferred to the division bench in the middle of the middle ground.
In assessing 10 pages before releasing the case to Bench Division, justice Bhattacharyya said: “Although it has been clarified that the chairman of the Justice (including the acting chairman of justice) is the master of the roster and ‘more equal among equal’, equality of excess is only related to the court administration side this and cannot overwrite the appellate side rules, framed and modified by a full court consisting of all judges from this honorable court.
“The Order also said,” There is a doubt about whether the chairman of Justice / Chair of the Chairperson, in his administrative capacity as Master list, can override the judicial order passed by the bench that has a determination, set by the chairman of justice.
/ Acting chairman of the judge himself / herself, and material files assigned to several other courts overnight.
“He also said,” There is no division bench that can Have a determination to take a civilian revision application, which concept g was studied by the most advocate junior when entering their bar.
Because this bench has a determination on the relevant date, namely July 16, 2021 and today, I feel the most indecent that, without showing the minimum courtesy of contacting me directly, this problem is trying to be assigned before several other benches.
“The judge heard the case on July 16 when a repeated online interference had pushed it to show – causing the administration of the High Court and the problem was registered to hear on July 19.
It was the second hearing transferred.

About the author

news2in