New Delhi: The city court said it was “very painful” to see that the standards of investigations in a large number of Delhi Northeast riots cases were “very bad” and after submitting Chargesheets “Halfbaked”, the police “didn’t bother” to take the probe to the logical end.
As a consequence, the defendant, ordered in several cases, continued to languish in prison.
Additional Judge Vinod Yadav said, “After submitting a Chargesheet in court, both investigative officers (IO) and Sho and supervisors who bother see what other materials must be collected from the appropriate authority and what steps are needed to be taken to investigate Logical end.
“It’s time for DCP (northeast) and other high-ranking officers who cares attention to observations and take immediate improvement, the court states.
Riots Probe: City Court said the senior police must act to avoid injusticethey (DCP (Northeast) and other high-ranking officers concerned) free to seek the help of experts in this matter, failing where there is a possibility of injustice caused by the people involved “It was noted.
Observations came while framing the allegations against Ashraf Ali and Parvej Ali for allegedly attacking the police and riots in Shiv Vihar with glass bottles, acids and bricks.
The court said Judge Illaka also failed to monitor the probe during the disposal process before taking awareness of this problem .
the judge said it was “very painful” to note that a large number of cases currently pending before it and in the majority of cases, IOS does not appear, either physically or via video conference.
“I have also been given to understand that the police have not given guidance to prosecutors Especially for allegations arguments.
In the morning heard, they only sent PDF emails from Chargesheet to SPP and left them to refute this problem without giving him the opportunity to go far to the facts and investigations carried out in this matter, “he added.
The judge.
Noted that this case is a striking example The victims were police personnel themselves, the court said IO still didn’t bother to collect samples of acid / corrosive and have their chemical analysis or collect opinions about the injury to the victim.
Observing that there was a substance in the advisory argument for the defendant, the court said the inception The report on the injury to the victims was fatal against the prosecution case.
The advice for the defendant claimed that they were involved in this problem.
However, the court found a substance in the argument that without chemical analyst reports, jerks caused by police cases.
While this could be caused by investigations the damaged one , it cannot be held to influence the credibility of the opinions given by the doctor in the case of Medico-Legal victims of the victims of Ravinder Yadav.
“This case cannot be thrown into the trash because of the damaged investigation by IO and due to lack of supervision by the ACP Subdivision and DCP of the Regency,” Judge added.