New Delhi: The election of foreign exchange for the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) has taken an interesting turn.
Only a few days ago, Batra Incumbent Narindent seems to be on track for other tasks as president of the body.
However, the sources have revealed that the Defense Minister Uni Rajnath Singh and MLA from Noida, Pankaj Singh, can also contest for the IOA post President, provided he received guarantees from the political corridor of the powerful dispensation.
He is also the BJP Secretary General for Uttar Pradesh.
PANKAJ is the president of the Indian fence association (FIA), which has the Batra Rajeev Mehta nemesis as the Secretary General.
Fai is a national sports federation ‘member’ (NSF) IOA.
The elected Pankaj was involved as president of the body of the fence in August this year.
Already learned that two of the top union ministers have supported their nomination after Mehta approached them with the idea.
Mehta itself has become unqualified to run for the Secretary General for the third consecutive term because of the ‘tenurial’ clause in the national sports code.
Mehta must undergo a four-year cooling period.
The only choice to remain relevant in the IOA function is to compete for the president’s office against Batra.
Mehta knew very well that he had no chance against Batra who had recently traveled to different Indian cities to meet officials of the State Olympic Association.
Equations have changed in recent weeks.
The possibility of the PANKAJ enters the commotion – and the court case was submitted by lawyers and sports activists Rahul Mehra against elections – have left Batra & Co..
on a complicated goal.
The situation is also not entirely in supporting the PANKAJ.
For him to qualify for presidency, one strict clause in the ‘memorandum and regulations and IOA regulations must be carried out.
The clause debated 11.1.3 read: “This will be a mandatory requirement for the selection of the President and Secretary General only the member, who has held the position and selected members at one of the previous executive councils, must be eligible to oppose the election.” Mehra Has submitted a petition at Delhi High Court, challenging IOA election behavior on December 19 at Guwahati.
The two advice representing the Union of India (UOI) and the Mehta camp have supported the withdrawal of verse11.1.3 to make members of General House IOA qualified to oppose the election.
This problem was highlighted in the presence of judge two Judges Manmohan and Najmi Waziri, who in November 30th directed temporary stays in the IOA election after Mehra argued that the selection process was “fully illegal and unsustainable”, violating national sports “, violating the code.
Court since It then maintains the status quo (living) in the election and has posted this problem for hearing and final assignment on December 15.
Strangely, there are two factions representing the IOA owned by Batra and Mehta in court.
In this background, a letter signed together by Officials of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and the Asian Olympiad (OCA) have emerged, citing “government disorders”.
It was not surprising that the letter was almost two days after the Batra meeting with King Randhir Singh, who was the president of OCA acting.
Delaying the election will buy a number of houses time to reach an agreement with the government to support the nomination A.
IOC and OCA have suggested IOA to reschedule the election given the delayed case in court but has urged the body to continue with the Annual General Meeting (GMS).
The letter has also explained that each constitutional amendment must follow the maturity process and then submit to the IOC for the previous agreement.