Kolkata: Calcutta High Court Judge Causik Chanda on Wednesday was soaked from hearing the Bengal CM Petition Mamata Banerjee on BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari Polling Nandigram, but also demonstrated Rs 5 lakh to “firmly” calculate the psychological and vilification adopted to seek the determination “.
Banerjee accused The petition that a long judicial association with BJP legal cells and taking cases for the party submitted “bias” and that “Court must be like Caesar’s wife, above suspicion”.
Chanda Judge said he had “no personal tendency to hear the case This “also did not have” hesitant to take the case “but he still chose to restugate because” the two people involved in this case belonged to the highest state of politics “.” Some opportunists have emerged …
on behalf of saving justice.
These mongers will try to keep controversy staying alive and creating newer controversies.
Test the case before this bench will be a tool to deviate themselves.
It will contrary to the interests of justice if an unwarranty fight continues together with the trial, “said the judge.
The fine of RS 5 Lakh must be paid to the West Bengal Bar Board to help the supporters of supporters who lost their lives for Covid, he ordered.
Banerjee did not respond to media questions on a fine.
“This is the subjudice problem.
I will not talk about this.
The lawyers will make a decision, “he said.
But other Trinamool leaders and the BJP IT cell heads rose to Twitter after order.
Trinamool Rajya Sabha Leader and spokesman for Derek O’Brien, without directly referring to the assessment, tweeted:” We live and learn , We live in a world where the truth costs are now equipped with a surprising price label: Rs 5 Lakh.
We live in a world where propaganda and falsehood are also stacked.
Price: free.
Get a reference? Modi Hai to Mumkin Hai.
Go figure.
“Trinamool Lok Sabha MP Mahua Moitra, which includes the Chanda Judge’s case has appeared for BJP as a lawyer mentioned in the command of Justice Chanda, tweeted:” The best petulance today.
Realizing there was no way out but to hold back, he decided to slap Rs 5 Lakh well just because he could.
It’s rather like a teacher realizes true students & breaks blackboard.
“BJP leader Amit Malviya, however, feel fines are” small quantities “.” The good thing in Banerjee to show judges in bad light is a small amount, given the potential of actions and his words to cause erosion of ordinary people’s beliefs in our institutions.
He also has an EC that is slandered during the election, “he tweeted.
Judge Chanda said in his order that he did not agree with the cm petition that” long, close, close, personal, professional, money, and ideological “with political parties raises” conflict of interest ” .
“Almost impossible in this country to get someone who might not be said to have a political view.
Anyone who is interested in politics can be said to have ‘interest’.
Like other citizens in the country, a judge also trained voting rights for political parties but set aside individual accidents while deciding on the case, “he said.” The past association of a judge with political parties by itself could not form biased concerns.
“