Sydney: The following is a court order issued on Monday after Novak Djokovic’s success challenge for the visual cancellation of the Australian Government on his arrival last week.
Djokovic number one tennis world, vocal vocal mandate Covid-19 vaccine, has been in the detention of immigration in a Melbourne hotel since Thursday after visits canceled due to problems with his medical release from vaccination.
Djokovic was released from immigration detention on Monday night, with the government ordered to pay for the cost.
In the text below, the applicant is Djokovic and respondents are the Minister of Home Affairs.
The court order that: 1.
Delegation decision to cancel the temporary activity of the applicant (subclass 408) made on January 6, 2022 was canceled.
2.
Respondents pay the applicant’s fee (including the costs provided), as agreed upon or assessed.
3.
Advanced responders by taking all the steps needed to cause: 3.1.
The applicant immediately released and advanced from immigration detention and, without limitation, the release must occur no later than 30 minutes after making this order; and 3.2.
Applicant’s passport and all other personal effects to be returned to him immediately after it makes sense after making this order.
Notation: a.
Respondents acknowledged that the decision of the delegation to continue the interview and made the decision to cancel the Petitioner’s visa in accordance with (section) 116 of the 1958 migration law (Commonwealth) did not make sense in the situation in which: (1) at 5:20 January 6 2022 The applicant was told that he could have until 8:30 a.m.
to comment on responding to the intention notification to consider the cancellation below (section) 116 of the 1958 migration law (Commonwealth); (2) Instead, the Petitioner’s comments were then searched at around 6:14 a.m.
(3) Delegation decision to cancel the applicant’s visa made at 7.42 in the morning; (4) The applicant is denied until 8:30 a.m.
to make a comment; (5) Do applicants are allowed until 8:30 a.m., He can consult with others and make further submissions to delegates about why his visa should not be canceled.
B.
This order was spoken verbally in an open court at 5:16 a.m.
On Monday, January 10, 2022.
C.
The court was informed by respondents, through his advice on his instructions, that the Minister of Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs could consider whether to train the power of personal cancellation to Sub-Section 133C (3) of Law Invite Migration 1958 (Commonwealth)