Bengaluru: In the midst of tension and violence in educational institutions in the state, the Karnataka High Court on Tuesday was postponed, until Wednesday, the trial of the petition about questioning the rejection of permission to hear the headscarf with the Udupi and other pre-university students.
Justice’s single bench Krishna S.
Dixit also asked the student community to maintain peace in the state.
The court will take problems on Wednesday at 2:30 pm.
Safe! You have managed to throw your votelogin to see remedy while, given the volatile situation in the state with a background of the hijab crisis, the BJP government has stated a three-day vacation for schools and colleges starting from Wednesday.
The Chairman of the Minister of Bumavaraj Bommai has asked the students to wait until the court order and not provoked.
“I begged all students, teachers and management of schools and colleges as well as Karnataka people to maintain peace and harmony.
I have ordered the closure of all secondary schools and colleges for the next three days.
All concerned was asked to work together,” he said.
At the hearing on Tuesday, the bench asked for advice to briefly present their arguments, said the argument and conflict could not be heard until the end of the academic year.
Justice Dixit also observed that the court had trust in public discretionary strength and students.
Advocate General Prabhuling Navadagi, appearing for the government, will present his argument before the bench on Wednesday.
However, the bench did not accept his request to give temporary orders to stop protests until this problem was heard by the court.
Advice that arises to the applicant who is looking for permission to use a headscarf submitted to court that the ruling of the Kerala High Court, who came against the use of headscarves, related to the problem of Christian colleges, and has no relationship with the case of Karnataka.
“Really religion is the right of students too.
The State Government has referred to the decision of the Bombay High Court in the case of Fathima Sayeed.
In that case Fathima had sought assistance from the Bombay High Court because he was not allowed to attend a lecture at the hijab.
The court has ruled against his appeal because It is a girl’s college.
It cannot be implied here because the state government has implemented a government in all universities, “Devdutt Kamates, advice for the applicant.
“Hijab is an integral part of Islam.
It is used to cover the neck and hair.
All Muslim scholars have agreed to this fact.
The government can say wearing a true headscarf but it cannot prevent students from wearing a headscarf.
If not the government wants, it can give color This problem.
All religious faith can also be dubbed in a certain way.
The government gives the color of the hijab with the pretext of maintaining the legal and order situation.
If a Sikh wears a turban, Brahmin wears tilak, how is the legal situation and order influenced? “He asked.
“Can wear tailers stopped if anyone feels bad? The action of wearing a headscarf to sit in a separate room is a violation of fundamental rights.
Article 14 is for our protection.
Everyone is equal to the law,” he said.
At this stage, Advocate General NavadaGi objected, accusing advisors to make accusations without the basis and could be proven to be dangerous for the community.
He said that someone should not give a statement that shows that there is an attack on all headscarves.
Kamath stated that it was “Untouchability” and a separate written statement was submitted about it.
He also asked government advice not to rule out his rights for freedom of expression.
Citing a Malaysian and US court verdict, he stressed that the decision to sweep to ban protests would oppose Article 19 of the Constitution.
Bench, at this point, observes that it is important to see whether the same feeling applies here, while foreign state assessments are quoted.