New Delhi: The Supreme Court has requested a response of the Karnataka Government and a MBBS student after recording the candy of a woman who is looking for a revival of rape cases submitted by her who violated after the settlement that she agreed to marry her.
A bench consisting of the Rights of Sanjay Kiswa Kuli and Hemant Gupta issued a notification to the state and defendants and directed them to submit their reply to the petition within one month.
The petition, which was submitted by the suspected victim, claimed that the defendant cheated him to believe that he would marry him, while simultaneously practicing fraud in creating a situation, including requests to oppress marriage.
The petition was submitted by Advocates Siddhartha Jha against the commands passed by the Karnataka High Court, which has occurred in September last year canceled the trial in Fir which competed with the alleged rape of MBBS students between 2017-2018, after the compromise was reached between the complainants and the defendant.
The petition before the top trial claimed that settlements between the parties were based on forced approval of women extracted by the defendant.
The petition claimed that the High Court ignored the commands that were passed by the peak court which had emphasized that in the case of rape, there was no dismissal on the basis of settlement or compromise because the crime was contrary to a woman’s body and dignity.
The victim claimed in the stuck before the upper court who was accused, became his senior at Rajarajeshwari Medical College, Bengaluru, took advantage of its dominant position.
According to the petition, the defendant made sexual relations with the victim on the wedding appointment.
However, then he refused to marry him and he filed a rape case against him, he said.
The case was then canceled when the two parties agreed to the settlement where the defendant promised to marry the woman as soon as the course they finished.
Immediately after the case was canceled, the defendant began to hostile and take care of women and his family, allegations.
“In fact, the defendant now demanded Mahar One Crore Hospital to marry the Petitioner.
The defendant has refused to give any sanctity to the relationship with the applicant and have made any possible efforts to apply relationships with him.” The situation after the dismissal has been explained that the marriage action offered by The Applicant is a deception to distinguish when, in fact, he harbored the intention to marry all the same sanctity, “the alleged petition.
(The identity of the victim has not been revealed to protect his privacy according to the direction of the Supreme Court about the cases related to sexual violence)