HYDERABAD: Chief Union K Chandrasekhar Rao has ordered an inquiry into the alleged property catching allegations made from MLA Eatala Rajender’s own son, E Nitin Reddy. The move comes as Eatala, his child and his family-run Jamuna hatcheries are under investigation for allegedly encroaching delegated temple lands in a variety of places. The question was ordered after a complaint lodged by Faith P Mahesh Mudiraj his property from Ravalkole village at Medchal-Malkajgiri district had been allegedly encroached upon by Nitin. He urged that the chief minister to offer justice. Mahesh is a Mudiraj, also a neighborhood of Backward Classes (BC) to that Eatala Rajender belongs. Reacting to the criticism from Mahesh, the main minister taught principal secretary Somesh Kumar to investigate into the complaint instantly. In addition, he taught the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Vigilance, Revenue as well as other concerned officials to perform an extensive probe and then submit a report at the very earliest. Eatala along with his household’s Jamuna hatcheries are already under evaluation from vigilance and sales officials for allegedly Heard about 100 acres of temple lands from Devaryamjal mandal along with other areas. A four participant IAS officers’ committee was appointed to investigate into the matter and they’ve allegedly submitted an account. But, Eatala Rajender was denying that these allegations as a effort to defame him. In his complaint correspondence into KCR, Mahesh explained his grandfather possessed 10.1 acres property behind poll no. 77 from Ravalkole village. “According to the 1975-76 Ceiling Act, the authorities had issued a certification. By Khasra Pahani from 1954 into Adangal Pahani from 1986, the earnings records revealed my cousin, Narasimha, since the proprietor,” he explained. Mahesh stated that following 1986, the titles of Satyam Ramalinga Raju and the others were revealed as owners in documents. “In the past couple of decades, the property belonging to my own grandfather had been bought by Nitin by exerting pressure . I’d attempted fulfilling the Union as he’s also in the Mudiraj neighborhood, but he didn’t fulfill me. I eventually got to meet with him approximately eight months ago but he cautioned me against speaking about it,” Mahesh alleged. “I possess the 38-E certification as well as the Pahani records which have my mother’s name on this. According to Tenancy and Dentistry Act, we’ve had faith on this property for a long time. Give us our land back,” he said.
KCR orders Fight against Eatala’s son on Property Catch charge
