Thiruvananthapuram: Amendment to Lok Lok Ayukta will not affect the case process before that, said Lok Ayukta Justice Cyriac Joseph.
He heard complaints about the use of distress cm assistance funds.
Judge Joseph made observations after UPA Lok Ayankta Harun Al Rashid questioned the urgency of the case against the background of the amendment.
He said that the regulation was about the implementation of the Ayankta Lok command; This means the process will continue as usual.
Ordonance does not make Lok Ayukta from the command according to Part 14 of the Act.
The MOOT Point is about its implementation.
Without giving anyone’s name, Joseph’s Justice Cyriac said no need to respond to what the media said and politicians said.
“If someone goes near a street dog that chews the bones, it will assume that the person who approached the bones from him.
The dog will continue to chew bones.
We have nothing to do with it, that’s all,” he said.
.
The next hearing in the CMDRF case in the Minister of February 25, KT Jaeel who was forced to resign from the cabinet after Lok Ayukta said it was not feasible for a position to flatten several charges against Joseph Cyria Joseph to change Lok Ayankta ACT to be controversial.
In the case of the CMDRF, the government on Friday believes that this is a cabinet that decides on funding and Lok Ayukta cannot hear cases that challenge the rights and prerogative rights of the cabinet.
However, Applicant R S Sasikumar argues that the complaint did not oppose the cabinet but the head of ministers and ministers who were arbitrarily used CMDRF to help people from their personal choices.
Instance asked includes financial assistance provided from the CMDRF to the former MLA K K Rama family and the Uzhavoor Vijayan NCP leader.
Lok Ayukta has asked both parties to submit documents that justify their argument.
This case will be heard further on February 25.