Thiruvananthapuram: Opposition locks the horn with the government for a shortage of one seat plus, where the rationing process is taking place.
A similar request, to increase seats, from the ruling bench raised by KK Shailaja came as a layer of sugar on the cake for the opposition, referred to as the original complaint from each member, regardless of the ruler or opposition bench.
However, the Minister of General Education V Sivankutty, who assured that every child will be given a seat, adding that it cannot be ascertained that each student will get a chair for the flow of choice.
Looking for leave for the delay movement, Mla Shafi Parambang raised the problem by saying that the government’s approach to uniformly increases the number of seats to plus one unscientificary course, and will result in children who cannot choose their chosen flow or school.
Sivankutty said that compared to the last five years, the number of students passed SSLC and applied to plus one less course.
The number of applicants for plus one is 4.65,219 while the number of students who qualify with A-Plus is 1,25,509, which three times compared to previous years.
After the first allotment, there were 1.59,840 applications that were delayed and there were 1,92,951 seats left for allotment.
After converting a reservation seat that was lying empty after the first allotment as a public seat, all students would be ensured seats with the second rationing settlement and entrance tickets, he said.
The minister said that there will be a surplus seat after the receipt process is complete.
He added that considering the current government financial position, it could not round up a new batch in schools where there was a lack of seats, but could only increase seats in batches.
Then, the opposition leader VD Sathean said the situation in the state was such that even though it accommodated A-plus in all subjects, students were rejected into their choice of courses.
Chasing the government, he said that if there were excess chairs, the government must consider allocating it to students from Karnataka or Tamil Nadu.
The Minister of Education replies that since Karnataka or Tamil Nadu has not carried out the SSLC exam, students from these countries will not be eligible to enter.
Sathean replied that the government could not deny seats to students from the CBSE or ICSE syllabus even if they came from Karnataka or TN, even though the council did not carry out tests and ministers must know these things before making a statement before conducting a statement.
He said that with the current government approach, students, who must depend on open schools, will be three times higher than last year and the government, which offers strengthening of general education in the public sector, promoting the private sector management seat taking large contributions Even for one seat plus.
The opposition then took a way out after speaker M B Rajesh denied leave for the postponement movement on the basis of the minister’s reply.