Kochi: In setbacks for the center, the Kerala High Court on Friday held the union government from taking coercive actions against members of the Broadcasters News Association (NBA) under the new rules.
PB of Justice Suresh Kumar issued a stay, along with notice to the center of Plea NBA challenging the new rules in the field that they provide excessive forces to the government to limit freedom of speech unreasonably and unfairly.
NBA is a consortium of 78 private television news and current affairs broadcasts, including 25 leading country channels.
During the hearing of acceptance, Senior Advocate Maninder Singh proposed that the High Court had passed the order to hold the government to take coercive actions under the new rules above the online legal news portal, Livelaw.
After submission, the court ordered that there was no coercive action that must be taken against the NBA because it did not comply with the new rules in the view of the order passed in the case of Livelaw.
In the petition, NBA argues that the new rules provided in Information Technology (Broker Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Codes), 2021 is Ultra Vires for Information Technology Act, 2000.
Also states that new rules violate such constitutional rights as rights For equality before the law (Article 14) and the right of freedom to practice any profession or to do work, trade, or business (Article 19 (1) (g).
NBA also said in his request that it challenged part III of the new rules, Entitled ‘Code of Ethics and Procedures and Protection in relation to digital media, because they create “supervision mechanisms that provide unlimited, unbroken and excessive executive forces to regulate digital news media content”.
The NBA statement about litigation said, “repetition mechanism Complaints are made, and the power is delegated, has a ‘cold effect’ on the content of the media.
Writ also m enynakan that executive, by creating the struc.
Ture, has made a breakthrough into the force of justice and gives his property with the strength provided exclusively for the justice and implementation of such power without jurisdiction.
“This has been obtained by the NBA in the petition that the new rules with their actions ultra.
Because the action does not contain provisions to deal with any program content.” The rule violates article 14 because there is no parity or implementation of legitimate classifications in rules as’ intermediary ‘It has been equated with’ digital news media ‘, “said petition.’ Program code ‘has applicable for digital news media through new IT rules.’ Code program ‘contains conditions that are unclear, inappropriate, and ambiguous in relation to content such as’ Delicious taste ‘and’ arrogant attitude ‘.
Therefore,’ program code ‘is not in consentance with the Supreme Court’s decision on this issue, said the petition.