New Delhi: Fresh Applications Submitted in the Supreme Court on Thursday at the Hijab Row in Karnataka Increasing the Problems Right to practice religion as immortalized as fundamental rights in the Constitution.
The request submitted by the President of the Srinivas BV Youth Congress and a journalism student argued that there was a direct violation of fundamental rights and also because of the events that occurred in various countries and the possibility of spreading further, would be better and appropriate that the peak court doubted the problem.
The request said that different high courts in different states can cross conflicting orders.
“Everyone has the right to wear clothes / heads of their chief choices and practice their own religion, customs and traditions.
If a child child is seen wearing a” headscarf “, it can ‘not come out of his choice’ but for adult girls and women and women Adults Where it is their choice, rights must be protected.
The belief in religion is one thing but religious fanaticism is another aspace At least the schools, colleges and educational institutions should not be made in the battlefield for the fight against religious fanaticism, “said the application submitted through Advocates Roopesh Singh Bhadauria and Mareesh Pravir Sahay.
It is said that disputes are related to whether” headscarves “or heads.
Scarves are an integral part of Islam or cannot end only after consideration of the court above and on code problems dressed in uniforms for educational institutions.
“Also, the basic rights of individuals and constitutional rights in this aspect need to be considered and enforced which includes wearing” headscarves “or head scarves.
Muslim girls and women must be given the right to choose and the right to wear “headscarves” if they choose it, as their fundamental rights, “said the application Chief Judge NV Ramana and said the problem was that the school and college were closed.
“The girls were stoned.
It spread throughout the country, “he said Hearing and also decide.