New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday declared unhappiness at the speed of investigation by the Uttar Pradesh police in the case of Lakhimpur Kheri and recommended monitoring the investigation sitting pensioners of the High Court Judge.
The top court bench headed by CJI NV Ramana, and consisted of Judge Surya Kant and Hima Kohli, told ‘No’ for the CBI probe into the incident said “CBI is not a solution for everything.
We want HC judges who are returned to monitor probes and Separate Chargesheets Submission.
We want to protect the evidence collected.
“The top court said the two incidents – cut the farmer’s protest by vehicles and Hindik charges – must be investigated and taken to a logical conclusion.
The Supreme Court heard problems relating to the October 3 incident where eight people, including four farmers, were killed in violence during farmer protests.
The Apex Court said it was not confident about the way in which the evidence was recorded by Sit.
The following is a court observation in the case – a stool headed by the chairman of the judge and Ramana rebuked the police up and said: ‘The inquiry rate is not in accordance with expectations’.
* SC asked the police why cellphones were all accused of being confiscated, except those accused of Prime Ashish Mishra so far.
“Do other defendants not use cellphones,” asked SC.
* The court noted that when the police were 16 accused of in farmers cutting the incident 3 sentenced to death.
“Why did you catch an accused phone? Where you said in the status report that the rest of the defendant threw their cellphone but the police had restored CDR,” he asked.
* The Apex Court said the prime view of the facie obtained was that one accused of benefiting from recording witness statements specifically.
“What will be an investigation,” asked.
* The Supreme Court said it was not in status reports other than saying that more witnesses had been examined.
* Also record delays in the procurement of forensic reports on video evidence.
* Senior advocate of Harish ointment that appeared for the Uttar Pradesh government told the court that the laboratory report would come on November 15.
* The Supreme Court said it was not on the CBI probe into the incident that said the CBI was not a solution.
* The upper Court said that he was trying to instill justice, independence, and faith in an investigation into the Lakhimpur Kheri incident.
* SC asks the government whether to appoint a former judiciary of the Punjab High Court and Haryana Ranjit Singh because of monitoring investigations carried out by sitting in the incident of the murder of four farmers, the death of a journalist and Lynching of Three who was accused of in the incident.
* The upper government said it would respond to SC proposals on Friday, which was the next hearing date.
The Supreme Court has been on October 26, the Government of Uttar Pradesh to provide protection to witnesses under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018.
The upper court heard the material of Lakimpur Kheri after two lawyers written to CJI who were seeking high-level judicial investigations, also involved the CBI, into the incident that.
About the incidentfour, the farmers were cut by SUVs at Lakhimpur Kheri when the agitat group of three central agriculture laws held a demonstration against the visit of Deputy Uttar Pradesh Cm Keshav Prasad Maurya on October 3 and a driver was beaten.
Two BJP to death allegedly by angry protesters, while a local journalist was also killed in violence.
Farmer leaders claim that Ashish Mishra was in one of the cars allegedly knocked down the demonstrators but the minister had denied the allegations.
The police so far arrested several accused, including the Union Minister for Mishra’s Son Ashish Mishra’s home.
Farmers’ farmer organizations protest three laws – farmers produced the trade and trade and trade (promotion and facilitation), 2020, the essential commodity (amendment), 2020 and farmers (empowerment and protection) in the guarantee of price and agriculture.
Services Act, 2020 – since last November.
The APEX court has only implemented this law in January.
Initially, the protest began with Punjab but then spread to Delhi, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh.
(With input from the agency)