Chennai: The Government’s Government’s decision to pass the law to get rid of the national feasibility test (NEET) and to provide medical acceptance based on the sign obtained in the qualification examination based on the suggestion of the Committee led by the Head of Secretary V IRAI ANBU.
However, the legal validity of the legislation was questionable considering the Supreme Court had upholds the constitutional validity of uniform entrance examinations at UG and PG levels.
It also requires the approval of the president.
Read AlsoPamil Nadu plans to bring new law next week to cancel the Netthe government’s decision to get rid of laws to eliminate the law with the national feasibility test (NEET) and to provide medical acceptance based on the sign obtained in the qualification examination of the advice a committee led by the Secretary of Head V IRAI ANBU Neet.
The Rajan committee submitted his report on July 14.
The government said this would ensure social justice and protect all students from being discriminated against in reception for medical education.
It was studied by the CS LED Committee consisting of Secretary of Health, School, Higher Education and Law suggesting legal routes after the Rajan Committee reported the challenges faced by rural students, studied at government schools, in Tamil teaching.
The Rajan Committee found a sharp contrast in rural and urban student medical acceptance besides repeaters gained great access to medical courses rather than the first applicants.
“The new bill will be introduced on Monday or Tuesday.
Students must appear for Neet in September this year,” said a source.
The legal validity of the proposed Bill, Senior Advocate Km Vijayan said, “During high education, in matters relating to the determination of higher education standards, the power was given to the Trade Union Government.
Countries cannot pass the law in Under the entry 25 of the list III, subject to a particular entry in the I.
This area is an exclusive parliamentary domain.
“There is a heat exchange between the treasury and opposition for the behavior of NEET during the debate on demand for grants for the Department of Health and family welfare in the Assembly.
While the UPA government introduced Neet, the former head of Mr.
Mr.
Karyaidhi strongly opposed him.
The examination took place only when Aiadmk came to power, said Minister of Health MA Subramanian.
He reacted to Aidmk (Pappireddipatti) MLA Govindasamy, who wondered whether the DMK regime did not want to give credit to EPS for a 7.5% quota for government school students given that the policy record only quoted recommendations from retired judges by retirees.
Pleyilan P Kaliayarasan.
(With input from J Shanmugasundaram)