Kolkata: A part of the lawyer on Wednesday protested a brief protest in front of the Attorney General’s Office of the Prosecutor’s Office of Rajesh Bindesh demanding clarity about the assignment of things to the judges, even when the Association of the Calcutta High Court took the resolution to continue to beg for their case.
All courts as usual.
A nervous lawyer, who has not attended the judicial process in the Main Justice Court since Tuesday afternoon, is also the alleged Lacunae in the Logistics in the Calcutta High Court for virtual hearing.
Protests by some nervous lawyers held for a short period of time as five judges led by acting Chief Justice of Rajesh Bindal was the hearing of Pils on violence after the poll in West Bengal.
The protest was not called by one of the three associations – The Bar Association, Bar Library Club and the Law Communities incorporated – representing advocates in the High Court.
The Calcutta High Court Bar Association took a resolution in a general body meeting held in virtual mode on Tuesday night that members would attend the court from all the judges of the High Court.
It was noted that the members believed that when the situation for the normal function of the court continued, “Bar members should not use abstinence to participate in the judicial process before Judge Hon’ble.” The meeting decided to “attend their respective assignments before the Hon’ble Court for the benefit of a reconstripe,” and said that members of the Association Bar will review the situation after 15 days.
Appreciating the decision of the Association Bar member to attend their duties before the court, West Bengal Governor Jagdeep Dhankhar Tweeted: “Dialogue and deliberation are the essence of constitutionalism and legal rules, both are important to maintain democratic values.” Lawyers who did not participate in the judicial process in the acting court chairman of the Bindal Judge accused “violations of the rules of appeal by administrative decisions from the chairman of the chairman” and “deficiency” in logistics for virtual hearing.
A committee from five senior judges, who met with representatives from three associations on Monday, agreed to extend the time of the court function half an hour and also allowed hybrid hearings, where the lawyer would have a choice in front of the court in virtual.
Mode or physically.
Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya has been on July 19 released a problem where it has passed the caustic observation in the order of operating connectivity during a virtual hearing case, while expressing the reservation about the way it was assigned to the Division Bench, who was “Master of Roster”, from his palace.
Disturbed by connectivity issues during the audience in virtual mode, bhattacharyya justice on July 16 direct the coordinator of the Central Court’s Central Project to show the cause because why the process should not be compiled against the Administration of the High Court and Central Project Coordinator, in particular, for the criminal insult to sustainable disorders Virtual in court due to connectivity problems.
Reply to the notification notification show submitted on the same day, as directed.
Following the assignment of the material to the division bench, said Justice Bhattacharyya in the order on July 19 that on July 19, he was contacted by the Registrar General or “acting chief justice through his master’s secretary or OSD (Special Task Officer) seeking my approval or at least have courtesy to tell me about such assignments, “he said, according to him, eliminating his justice order in administrative capacity.
“I have serious doubts about transparency of the justice dispensation system in court we remember the chain of events above,” said Justice Bhattacharyya in the order.
He said that the power of assignment emerged from the concept of “Master of Roster”, “limit the administrative strength of the chairman of justice to establish certain benches to take certain types of problems, which cannot be done on RG’s behavior or even the Chairperson of the Supreme Court.” The Administration of the High Court has submitted a special leave petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court challenged the command of Justice Bhattacharyya.