BANGKOK: The lawyer to overthrow the leader of Myanmar Aung San Suu Kyi argues strongly on Tuesday to the introduction of evidence by the prosecutor with the cost of sense, saying it does not follow established justice procedures.
Suu Kyi was under detention and was tried on several allegations, including the allegation that he illegally imported Walkie-Talkies for the use of his bodyguards and used radio without licenses, and violated the covid-19 pandemic limitation on two occasions during the 2020 election of the campaign.
He went in court on June 14 in a closed court in the capital, Naypyitaw, in the process that the military-installed government is widely seen as a use to discredit it and consolidate its control.
The military took power in February after expelling the Chosen Suu Kyi government and arrested him and other high-ranking officials in the government and the National League for the Democratic Party, which will initiate the second five-year term after a landslide election victory last November.
The cost of the provincant, which is sometimes called incitement, provides a two-year imprisonment for anyone who is found guilty of causing fear or alarm that can trigger violations of the state or public peace.
This has been criticized as a capture statute – all used for political repression.
Suu Kyi’s lawyer last month objected to the introduction by the prosecution of two statements posted on the Facebook page of the Suu Kyi party after him and the President won Myint was arrested by the military in February.
Myintia is a defendant under the decking fee.
One statement, released by February 13, accused the military attached government to limit the rights of the people to freedom of expression and the internet and stated that all orders and laws issued by the government were illegal.
Lawyer Suu Kyi said they thought the statement should not be accepted because none of the defendants signed them.
The special court that conducted the trial did not support the objection of the defense but said he would suspend the testimony at that time while the defense signed a higher court.
On Monday, after the District Court refused the defense without trial, Suu Kyi’s lawyer said they would appeal to the regional court, and if necessary to the Supreme Court.
The lawyer objected again Tuesday when the Plaintiff, Bureaucrat Naypyitaw, introduced a piece of proof that was officially registered before the testimony began, said Min Min Soe, a member of the defense team.
The court allowed evidence, a list of members of the Central Executive Committee from the Suu Kyi Party, and their customers.
Suu Kyi faced additional allegations that had not been tried, including allegedly accepting bribes, which brought a penalty of up to 15 years in prison, and violated the official secret law, which carried a maximum period of 14 years.
The army said he would hold a new poll in two years after takeover, but confidence in almost content and could lead to Suu Kyi was prohibited from running, whose many believers were military goals.
Lawyer Suu Kyi compested evidence in the trial of Myanmar
