Mumbai: Observing that sending “obscene order” to a married woman cannot be called insulting its politeness, a court session released a man 36 years old, 11 years after he was ordered for raping him under him marriage.
It was held that sending such messages in a premarital period might be fun and gave a feeling that someone was close enough to understand someone’s emotions.
“If at all, it is not liked by other parties, he has wisdom with it to express his displeasure to the other side, and other parties generally avoid repeating such errors.
The aim is to install his hopes in front of him, to raise him with the same sex feelings, That might give happiness even to him, etc.
But in the way SMS can be said as sent to insult his modesty, “he said.
.
The woman has filed firs in 2010.
The couple had met on the Matrimonial site in 2007.
The man’s mother opposed the match.
In 2010, the man broke the relationship.
Make it from the accusation of rape, the court said every violation of promises to get married could not be called cheating or rape.
“The man had even been to the Arya Aryj hall with Mangalsutra but a fight in the land after marrying and afterwards, bored with his doubts and gave up before his mother’s wishes and failed to overcome the problem standing before him in the right way, he was back.
This is not a false promise Marriage.
That was the case of failure to make efforts, “he said.
‘Lewd’s message to fiance don’t insult the simplicity’
