New Delhi: Referring to Collusion between Supertech and Noida Authority that enabled the Company to build two 40-floors of illegal, the Supreme Court on Tuesday said tensions between developers and authorities throughout the country were leading to build unauthorized construction and need to be handled tightly .
Judge D Y Chandrachud and M R Shah said the rules and regulations were violated by developers who colluded with the authority of planning and their officials.
It is said that the Supertech case is an example of how builders and authorities work in collusion for illegal construction.
“Increased rampant in unauthorized construction in urban areas, especially in metropolitan cities where adding land values, premiums in doubtful transactions have been considered in several court decisions.
This situation often occurs in no small size because collusion between developers and planning authorities, “Bench said.
The APEX court said that two important considerations must be remembered when building a house to accommodate the constant waves of people in Metros – environmental protection and their well-being and safety that occupies these buildings.
“The regulations of the entire process are intended to ensure that construction that will have a severe negative environmental impact is not approved.
Therefore, when this regulation is roughly violated by developers, more often than not with the sense of regulatory authority, it attacks at the core of the city planning, so Directly lead to the danger of the environment and safety standard dilution.
Therefore, illegal construction must be handled strictly to ensure compliance with the rule of law, “said the court.
The Supreme Court bench, which has called Noida as a corrupt body during hearing, upholding the decision of the High Court of Allahabad to demand the wrong officer who has approved the construction of Twin Towers by Supertech.
“The construction of illegal towers has been achieved through collusion between officers Noida and the Petitioner (SuperTech) and his management,” he said, adding “this case record is full of instances that highlight collusion.” The court noted that the involvement of Noida’s authority was very large in various decisions taken to support the builder, including sanctioning a second revised plan in 2009 and his refusal to reveal the development plan under RTI’s actions and refused to act based on.
Firefighting reports in connection with violations of the minimum distance requirements in the Emerald court project.
The bench said the developer raised a false request and tried to mislead the court, while Noida officials had not acted Bona Fide in the dismissal of their duties.
“Appeal has bent to the point to produce a sanction plan made.
Therefore, we confirm the direction of the High Court including the sequence of demolition and for prosecution sanctions based on Part 49 Uttar Pradesh Urban Development Law, as included by Part 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Zone Development Act , against applicant officials and applicant officials and officers Noida, “SC Bench stated.
LLDR-Authorita Nexus needs to be handled tightly: SC
