New Delhi: Losing a case after debating the problem cannot be called a deficiency in the service in the part of an advocate, the Supreme Court said.
The top court says in every case where a persecutor has lost benefits and there is no negligence in the part of the advocate / s, it cannot be said that there is a lack of service by advocates, “losing a case on Merits after advocate argues that the problem cannot be said to be due to the service In the part of the advocate.
“In each litigation, one of the parties is bound and in a situation like that one of the parties who will lose to litigation can approach fora consumers for compensation that accuse the deficiency in services, which are not permitted at all,” a bench .
Consisting of Judge Mr.
Shah and BV Nagarathna said only in cases where it was found that there was a lack of service by advocates, there may be several cases.
Observations came to the appeal submitted by a man who challenged the command of the National Consumer Recovery Commission which refused to lack deficiency on part of the three advocates After he did for a case.
The upper court in November 8 said the district forum, the State Commission, and the National Commission had actually rejected the complaints submitted by the Petitioner against the three advocates that emerged in its name.
“There is no substance in the special leave petition.
However, we will reject the special leave petition at a cost that is expected Leave specifically, “Bench said.