Ahmedabad: Gujarat High Court on Wednesday asked the state government to explain to a written statement why it was objected to canceling criminal charges including violations of anti-conversion laws against husbands, in-laws and priests to consider marriage even after the victim confirmed that the fir it was not Right and he wants to continue his marriage life in the case of the country’s first love jihad.
This kasing is from Vadodara.
The FIR was registered with seven people including husbands two days after the Gujarat religious freedom law was changed on June 15.
Four people accused of this included husbands are still behind the bar and the woman tells HC, “If they are not enlarged in collateral, it will result in a derail of the matrimonial relations between informants (victims) and her husband who wants to live together as a couple who already Married.
“During the trial on Wednesday, the woman presented himself before the Justice of Ij Vora and stressed that he voluntarily submitted a petition demanding the issue of FIR.
The state government objected to his request and this directed the court to direct the government to submit a written statement on September 20 to explain the reason where the objects were in accordance with the victims and seven people were accused.
The woman had submitted in her request that she went to the Gotri police station to report certain small and trivial problems because of the matrimonial disputes which she believed to be borne by part 498a IPC.
“However, at this stage, certain religio-political groups intercred in this problem and communicate the problem by bringing the corner of the love jihad.
Also, because it was too excited about the police officers involved, facts and violations that were never mentioned or alleged by the informants came to be included In Fight, “the reading petition.
The victim expressed his surprise from the addition of rape and sodomy fees in FIR.
He also said that he did not approve the prayer of charges for forced repentance and then under the atrocitas acted a few days after he filed a complaint.
He also complained that his written statement clarified that FIR said that the fact was very wrong and incorrectly not received by a lower court while rejecting the guarantee to the defendant.
The victim and her husband who were accused had submitted them in relations since 2019 and they had knowledge of their respective religions.
They lurked marriage according to Islamic rituals and rituals and got married notaries.
A few days later, they also received an agreement registered where they decided to get their marriage registered under special marriage laws and the agreement also reflected guarantees from both sides that they would respect their partners.
Their families also knew about their relationship and the female father met with a witness of their marriage, but …
“The accusation in the FIR had been governed and sensational with police officers who were too excited about the orders of the political-religious group.”