Chennai: Madras High Court on Tuesday filed a series of questions to the Tamil Nadu government for the establishment of a committee to see the impact of the NEET, asking whether it had obtained the Supreme Court permit and whether the move would not violate the decision of the APEX court.
Removal of the National Enter Entering Test (NEET) is the promise of polls on the ruling DMK ruling and recently established a high-level committee led by Retired Judge Madras High Court, AK Rajan, to study the impact of the NEET in the candidate from the less fortunate social in medical reception.
Happy! You have managed to throw your votelogin to see the results “Have you got the Supreme Court permit (which has upheld NEET).
Will it not violate the APEX court ruling?” Included among the questions raised by the first bench from the chairman of Judge Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy.
The bench made observations when the pill petition from Secretary General BJP K Nagarajan came to hear today before.
The panel constitution seems to be a futile practice since SC has explained that Tamil Nadu must fall in line and receive neets, CJ observed verbally, adds, the previous state government has obtained a leave in front.
Is a panel.
Advocates R Shanmugasundaram told the judges that the Committee Constitution was a state government policy decision in the consultance with his election promises, to protect the interests of poor students in rural areas.
“Maybe.
But if it is contrary to the command of the Supreme Court, then it cannot be permitted,” said the bench.
But the judges ordered notification to the state and the central government that could be returned by a week.
The petition tried to cancel the order on June 10 this year from the Department of Secretary, the Welfare of the Family Welfare (MCA-1), about the Constitution of the Commission, said it was ‘not constitutional, illegal, unfair’ and without legal justification.
Among other things, the Petitioner argues that orders are passed by the state government opposed the procedures stated under the National Medical Commission Law, 2019.
When the Supreme Court has directed it to apply Neet with the order on August 22, 2017, it is not open to the state government to suggest alternatives.
In accordance with Article 261 of the Constitution, Faith and Full Credit will be given to the Proceedings of the Judicial APEX court.
The department should note that NEET is introduced in national interests and every effort to change the same thing will thwart the object and purpose of its introduction.
The purpose of the formation of the committee itself was illegal because it almost achieved public opinion about the assessment of the Supreme Court, the Petitioner argued.
Announcing the panel earlier this month, Minister M K Stalin said he would analyze if Neet had a negative impact on students from the classroom and if so, the committee would recommend improvement measures to the government.
NEET opposed by almost all political parties in the state, including the BJP Allied AIADMK, even when some medical candidates allegedly end their lives on this problem, either because of the bad score in the test, as in the case of Anitha from Ariyalur, or too afraid of the exam qualification.