New Delhi: Anand Mahindra, Chair of the Mahindra Group, on Wednesday posted videos on Twitter Thar who crossed the river in the middle of a strong current.
It has triggered strong anger on the social media platform with netizens call it ‘promote dangerous content’.
Anand Mahindra has a strong presence on micro blogging sites and often has opinions, differences, and ideas.
However, the recent appeared to find more detractors.
Mahindra on Twitter posted videos and wrote: After I RT will tweet about Bolero in Gujarat naving flood water, some of which share this video circulating on YouTube.
I think we might have to make a new vertical called ‘Amphibious Vehicle Mahindra’ (MAV!).
After I RT will be tweeted about Bolero in Gujarat naving flood water, some of which share this video …
https://t.co/99x1VXF4GW- Anand Mahindra (@anandmahindra) 1631714689000The video describes the new river across the river full of water and water with strong currents.
Alarming water level reaches the off-road SUV window line while trying to pass.
The driver after crossing the river, took turn back and repeated the process.
Thar was only launched in 2020 and in accordance with the specifications of 650 millimeter water flow capacity.
Netizens are divided by action and many find it scary, unpleasant and dangerous.
“…
I sincerely think as a responsible CEO, you should not share videos like this very dangerously and can encourage others to try such action …”: Writing Deepti Gupta.
Shashank Kishore wrote: “Why are there people who try things like that? It’s outside of me.” Isn’t it dangerous to promote this kind of thing? What if the PPL interpreted it to be normal? write other users.
When submitting a story, the post receives more than 1,700 retweet and 20,000 likes.
Replying to tweets, Balu wrote: I think we are waiting for some disasters to happen by promoting this kind of video even after seeing so many flood videos.
Looks good in advertising and lucky, not easily denying science and mother, it’s better not to try.
Echoing similar sentiments, Pawan writes: “Dear Sir, with respect I understand your emotions involved in your powerful machine, but it’s not a safe action.
If someone tries this and unfortunately face death, I don’t know what mistakes must be counted.
“