New Delhi: In the middle of the fresh stand-off between the Supreme Court and the top center the last states the right to reject the name recommended by the Judge SC LED panel for the appointment to the court, CJI NV Ramana warns that in a democratic country regulated by the rule of law in Under the constitution, the government cannot say it will not accept this recommendation.
The bench, also consisted of Judge Dy Chandrachud and LN Rao, accused the cherry retrieval center from the list of people recommended by the cum-selection search committee headed by the Supreme Court judge for the appointment to the General Attorney General of Venugopal.
It was said, “Make all the appointments in two weeks and give a reason to reject the name recommended by the election panel.
We will hold our hands for two weeks on the initiation of the insulting process.
Give us a comprehensive picture of designation and vacancies.” The sound and anger of the court accompanied by using the threat of insulting force the government to resign from its position and promise through the Attorney General that it was prepared to consider all the names recommended by the election panel, including those who had never been appointed.
However, on AG’s request, SC agreed to provide two weeks to the government to fill vacancies with the name recommended by the election panel.
“We give the last two weeks.
Please come up with a comprehensive appointment and vacancy position with a promise.
The Attorney General ensures that all the recommendations of the recommended name will be made within two weeks.
If anyone is not appointed, the government will provide reasons..
After two weeks, “said SC in its order.
Detailing his complaint, the CJI LED bench showed that of 41 names recommended by the election panel for the income tax appeal court, only 13 were appointed by the government and it was also with cherry retrieval.