Mumbai: Bombay High Court on Tuesday Minister Nawab Malik to submit Affidavit about why the action should not be taken for him for intentional violations not to post or make a statement in Dnyandev Wankhede and his family members Sameer.
“We prima facied satisfied that the effort given to him …
had been deliberately violated,” said the judicial bench SJ Kathawalla and Milind Jadhav after hearing a senior adviser’s request for nerve Birendra for Dnyandev Wankhede that Malik had violated his promise and had been on December 3 Interviews made an unreasonable statement against the Wankhede family.
The nerve said, “Is this a kind of joke?” He quoted and completed the three prints where he said the interview was given by Malik and to the post on the social media page on December 3 where he reiterated comments about Wankhede’s journey abroad and made comments about his actions.
HC noted that the approval order was continued on November 29 where approved by Respondents -Nawab Malik-in advocates not to make posts or comments or interviews against Wankhedes.
A statement made by him was accepted as an effort by HC, the backup was noted.
The statement carried out by Malik’s first on November 25 and reaffirmed on November 29 as stated in the order of HC deliberately violated said Wankhede’s advice.
“It’s amazing how it can happen,” the nerve was delivered.
“Our attention is interested in interviews given by Malik,” HC said.
The request was raised by the court about whether the statement made by Malik was in his personal capacity or as a minister.
“After taking instructions, we were told that he had made it a spokesman for the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP),” HC said.
During hearing when HC raised the query, Malik Karl Tamboly’s advice at first said he had no instructions.
“Who instructs you.
The last time was the daughter-in-law.
Who is there now?” Judge Kathawalla asked.
Tamboly said it was an advocate on the record (AOR).
The judge persists with, “Who instructs AOR? This is not the answer that you don’t have instructions.
Then we will call him here.” Tamboly said, “Okay we will bring him here.” Then Tamboly said, “We have instructions that he speaks in his capacity as a party spokesperson.” Where the bench asked “which party?” The bench then had read through the Marathi mold and said, “He (Malik) seems to have finished reaching our order.” But HC said, “Before we take any action we direct it to submit Affidavit on Friday” to state why there is no action taken against it because of intentional violations.
“The next session before HC will now be on December 10 Sameer Wankhede and his family until a judge decides the interim’s request against posting the suspected slander by hatred ‘and posted without reasonable verification, it has not been given a “blanket’ command to him as sought.
The single judge instead said the basic rights of both parties balanced and directed Malik to tweet only after verification that made sense The future.
Wankhede but in his appeal said that the order in Malik should have been applyed by quoting the Supreme Court’s verdict who said so ‘hatred’ was found, still had to follow.