Mumbai: Bombay HC on Monday said Tweet NCP Minister Nawab Malik against NCB Officer Sameer Wankhede “was driven by hatred and or personal hostility”, but the blanket was relieved to hold it from posting openly every content of defamation against the family of officers who could not be granted.
This stage is like he is looking for by his father.
“At the prime phase of this facie and on the basis of the material on the note, it cannot be said that the accusation made by it is completely wrong,” HC said.
In the interim order of advertisements – an urgent initial order, Judge Madhav Jamdar said even though the tweet – some of whom were careful – raises a very important problem regarding the actions and behavior of Sameer Wankhede, public officials, there must be a balance of rights to the privacy of the family of NCB officers with the freedom of Malik , both fundamental rights.
HC order said, “The right to the privacy implies in life and freedom is guaranteed to residents of Article 21.
Residents have the right to protect their privacy, however, the defendant has made accusations against the Plaintiff’s son – Sameer Wankhede, therefore, which was posted as Zonal Director NCB , therefore, he is a public official.
The public has the right to examine and comment on the actions of public officials.
However, as held by the Supreme Court must be done after verification of reasonable facts.
“HC said,” Can’t be said (Malik) acting After verification of reasonable facts, however, at the prime stage of this facie and based on the material on the note, it cannot be said that the charges made by it are completely wrong.
“” It is necessary to direct the defendant (Malik) that he must verify facts which is reasonable before publishing, writing, speaking in the media including electronic media and social media or publics n in any way the number / material is the amount to slander the Plaintiff or family member, “Jamdar Justice said in the order of 50 pages.
He searched for a reply from Malik to Plea Wankhede in two weeks and posted this problem to hear until December 20.
Malik, through senior adviser Atul Damle, has argued that Sameer Wankhede is “Muslim” at birth and argues that coat a defamation cannot be maintained.
While Senior Adviser Arshad Shaikh for Wankhede said Malik had not verified before tweeting “slander”.
That HC also said, “It is very important to note that” Wankhede produces documents to prove his opinion that “his name is Dnyandeo and he belongs to” Mahar “who is recognized by SC.”