New Delhi: In a written statement submitted to the Supreme Court, the Haryana Government said thousands of structures, including strategic installations such as the Air Force Station, CRPF and ITBP complexes, NSG campuses, all IMT in Manesar, Jail and Gurgaon’s -Secretariat, besides hundreds of governments and The company’s office must be destroyed if the Haryana government strictly implemented a court order to treat the land that was notified under the forest (PLPA) as a forest.
PLPA is a law – in protecting large arabal channels, especially hill feet.
The state has claimed that all regions of Gurgaon, Faridabad, Palwal and eight other districts have been notified under several PLPA sections, which were put in in 1900 to prevent soil erosion and not include forests and protected areas in the ambition.
Affidavit added from the government Haryana, which has been submitted in sustainable hearing to clean the encroachment forest land in Khori Village in Faridabad, has surprised activists and former state forest officers who have opposed their steps to take a massive treaty.
Aravalis from the scope of the PLA.
The Apex Court on October 5 directed the state government to submit factual accounts about how the region in question was notified as a forest area.
R Balwan, a former forest conservator and former member of the committee formed by the Central Empowerment Committee appointed by the Supreme Court (CEC) for the rearrangement of Aravalis, told TII the country misleading the court.
“The state government tries to create fear by trying to illustrate that the entire region in 11 districts is forest.
It’s wrong.
From a total of 44.21 lakh hectares of land in Haryana, only 31,278 hectares are closed below part 4 and 5 PLPA as a forest.
Gurgaon, 6,821 hectares and in Faridabad, 561 hectares have been notified below this section.
All gurgaon, the main part of Faridabad and other districts have been notified below the part 4 under the ‘general order’, which determines that the tree logging is not permitted without the previous permission, “Balwan said.
For a long time, there is an internal struggle between the forest department and Haryana’s income where land parcels can be treated as “forests”.
The Supreme Court, in the previous order, has gone through the record delivered by the Ministry of Forestry while enforcing that all areas identified as “forests” must be a no-forestry zone.
But the state government has now argued that the problem of land declaration below 4 and 5 PLPA or forests must be decided based on records managed by the income department.
Department, “Mandamus”.
Affidavit said no land notified under Section 4 & 5 PLPA has been recorded as forest land in income records.
The state also said the goal of telling this land under the PLPA was to save and restore land and must apply to a limited period of time.
“PLPA’s intention has never made or convert land that is notified to forest land in any way.
Closure or prohibition requested to be enforced as a while solely as measures to regulate, limit or prohibit certain activities during the closing period which is raised after the end That period, “the country argues.
The Haryana government in 2019 changed the PLPA to enable construction and also to protect previous construction, including in the parts of an ecologically sensitive araravalis, but the peak court still followed the decision, slamming it as “intentional adventurism” which violated the previous court order.
The court said the actions of the government Haryana was “annoying and insulting” and expressed annoyance on “courage” to violate his orders that prohibit mining and construction activities.