Chandigarh: In cases that are rarely heard related to the escape couple, the Punjab High Court and Haryana have directed Rohtak police to provide protection to a girl, who has been married to the wishes of her parents, so she can visit her parents’ house to collect.
Documents related to their education qualifications.
Interestingly, in this case, both boys and girls are MBBS doctors from the rich family.
The girl wants to join MD of course but she hesitant to visit her parents’ house caught her threat because her decision to marry her chosen boy.
He wanted to visit his house to gather his birth certificate and educational certificate so he could apply for MD.
Justice Amol Rattan Singh from HC passed the order while hearing the petition filed by the Rohtak-based pair, the two MBBS doctors.
“Applicants will be given the protection of life and freedom if they capture any threats in the hands of respondents No.4 to 7 (the girl’s family member) included at the time of the Petitioner No.1 (girl) went to pick him a certificate from his parents’ house, namely from the respondent’s house No.4 and 5 (female parents).
Therefore, because of that, therefore, it provides adequate protection by SP and Sho when it goes to collect its certificate from her parents’ house.
On Tuesday, July 27 or Another date before August 1, “The judge has ordered.
Importantly, it is the second petition submitted by a couple who captures the threat to their lives and freedom.
Previously on January 19, 2021, HC had asked SP Rohtak to see the perception of threats to a partner and took action according to it.
In the fresh petition, the girl looked for instructions to protect it and allow her to get her birth certificate, an educational qualification certificate and other documents from her parents.
When this problem arose to hear before HC, the judge asked to quote the assessment he wanted on the problem that had been a petition titled as Criminal Writ Petition finally has been thrown by this court, how this court has jurisdiction to change the judgment, considering the bar contained in Section 362 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
In this advice for the applicant, advocate Vikas Chatrats quoted some assessments and hard argued about the need for court intervention on the problem.
Chatrath argues that the girl’s parents still not reconciled with marriage.
Advice said that he was worried that he went to his parents’ house to get his certificate, he might have a threat from them.
Hearing the impression, HC observed that the bar contained in the part 362 CR.P.c.
would not apply in any case, only with observations to be made again by this court in connection with the protection provided by the Police Authority.