Mumbai: The Judge Court on Friday rejected actor Bollywood Shah Rukh Khan Aryan for guarantees with the reason for the maintenance and jurisdiction of the court.
It refused his guarantee request Arbaaz Merchant, 26, and Munmun Dhamecha, 28, too.
The court only said the operative part of the order, and the reason would follow later because the end of the court and dictation would take a long time.
Khan Advisor Satish Maneshinde said in court that it was fine if the operative part was delivered because if necessary, they would be ready to approach the court session.
Then, he refused to comment.
But with the weekend in front, it would be two nights in prison before the fresh bail request was taken to hear in the session court.
The three were arrested on October 3 after the attack by the Narcotics Control Bureau on a cruise ship which caused drug confiscation.
Manyeshinde said with “even one ounce” Oly’s contraband found on him, he should not be denied guarantees and with alleged chat on his phone before without recovery, he could not be stored in a while.
The application “could not be maintained” before the court, said the head of the Magistrate Metropolitan R M Nerlikar, after hearing and accepting the initial objection submitted by NCB specifically for advice, ASG Anil Singh, and Advaits prosecutors agents.
Singh quoted an assessment, including those with Bombay HC giving guarantees to the actor Rhea Chakraborty, where all NDPS violations cannot be responded to and therefore this case can be exclusively noticed by a special court, which is a session court, making the judge, making the judge, giving judge.
Sans jurisdiction to consider guarantees.
The court session has jurisdiction to hear and provide regular guarantees and with the virtue also consider the application for temporary guarantees, while the judge can only give a return grant, said Singh, emphasizing that he did not trample the guarantee.
“I don’t say they can’t look for it anywhere else.
It can’t be maintained here (Esplanade Court),” he said, adding that on October 7, the court has continued this case to a special session court.
The court first heard maneshinde and advocated Taraq Sayed for Merchant and Ali Kaashif Khan for Dhamecha.
They said that not only the judge was empowered to provide guarantees, also their elderly was entitled because NCB did not show material.
Sayed said the NCB case, if accepted, only said 6 GM Charas was found to him, which attracted the most maximum of 6 months in prison.
Singh said the NCB case against 17 people so far is one of the criminal conspiracies where witnesses and evidence will be general.
There is no possibility that there are two experiments and guarantees to some people inhibit the probe as an influential defendant can damage the evidence and witnesses.
Lawyers for Trio denied being part of a criminal conspiracy.
Manyeshinde said only because of part 27 a (trade) under the NDPS law called, it could not be difois to Khan.
MANESHINDE said Khan “belongs to a respectable family with roots in the community.” “Just because he is from an influential family, it cannot be the basis for suggesting he can damage the investigation or deny his guarantee.” He quoted an assessment which basically said that the effects of unhealthy practice to deny or opposing guarantees is that people who are demanded evil remain in prison.
“They (NCB) say they have chat, but for their guarantee it can be ignored,” said Maneshinde.
ASG said, “Chat relevant …
Chat refers to the number of” bulk “.” He said suppliers were arrested and now Nigerian people also with commercial quantities.
The Chinedu Igwe National Award Return Court to NCB NCB until October 11.