New Delhi: One of the members of the Supreme Committee appointed by the Supreme Court on the issue of agricultural law, Anil Ghanwat, has been written to the Chairman of India Judge NV Ramana, looking for the release of panel reports in the public domain so that the recommendations can “open the” way “for the government to complete farmer agitation Ongoing.
“I felt that the report had not received attention by the Supreme Court,” said Ghanwat, the President of Maharashtra-based Shetkari Sanghatana, in his two-page letter to the chairman of the judge.
The Committee of three members, based on SC on January 12 for the top recommendation debated agricultural law, has submitted its report to the APEX court on March 19.
The court, who suspended the implementation of three central agricultural laws, however, did not take problems in the last five months.
Agricultural economist and Ashok Gullati and PK Joshi Agricultural Sector other panel members.
“As a member of the Committee, Ter The main representing the farmer community, I feel painful that the problems raised by farmers have not been resolved and agitation continues, “Ghanwat said in his letter to the chairman of the judge on September 1 when referring to the ongoing farmer protest, especially in Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan parts.
A number of farmer organizations, gathered as a group together under ‘Samyukta Kisis Morcha’, has been nervous to revoke three agricultural laws since November last year.
Noting that the committee enters opinions and suggestions from all stakeholders, Ghanwat claims that the report has discussed all the worries of the farmers.
“The Committee believes that the recommendation will open the way to resolve the ongoing farmer agitation,” he said, urging the APEX court to release a report for the implementation of its recommendations for “peaceful resolution of farmer expansion at the earliest satisfaction”.
The center has held 11 rounds of talks with farmer unions until January 22, but this problem cannot be resolved because farmer groups have insisted on revoking laws even when the government agreed to carry out certain amendments in controversial provisions while placing the implementation of the law that was postponed during 18 months.
In addition to demanding the revocation of agricultural laws, enforced by the government in September last year, farmer organizations have also demanded legal guarantees to procure all plants with minimum support prices (MSP) throughout the country.
Farmers’ protests are worried that new agricultural laws will not only dismantle the existing state ‘bathing’ (agricultural market) system but also end the MSP procurement mechanism.
The government, on the other hand, said commitment to further strengthen ‘Mandis’ and agricultural law did not end the MSP regime.
Members of the panel appointed SC in agricultural law looking for a report to be published, the court said he had not yet noticed
