Madurai: Busybodies pamper yourself in unreasonable activities’ and waste judicial time, be careful.
The Madras High Court imposed an example fee of 1.5 lakh to a 63-year-old nobleman that blamed the Locking of Covid-19 government and used the Corpus Habeas route that claimed that the rights and fundamental income had been restricted.
He also looked for 5 lakh as compensation.
Require the request, the court said that if he failed to pay a fee within 15 days, the Madurai collector would restore the number by appealing the Revenue Recovery Law, 1890.
HC: Applicant is an attempt to mock the country, the number of centtrets must be paid to Covid-19 Ward Hospital The Rajaji government in Madurai.
“This court strongly believes that the attitude of the applicants here is detrimental to selfless services provided by doctors, health workers and other Covid soldiers, who have lost their lives while caring for Covid-19 patients.
Unless each petition here is punished for Their activities are unreasonable, approaching the court with a reckless petition, this court made the sacrifice of selfless people going to go in vain, “said the Justice division bench S Vaidyanathan and Justice G Jayachandran.
Applicant is mocking sincere prevention efforts taken by the state and union governments to reduce pandemics, observe the judges, adding that he claims that the Covid-19 virus and its variants are not deadly and that they can be cured in ordinary courses, if the health department is alert and provide appropriate health care to the public.
Instead of doing what he has suggested, the government issued orders that impose restrictions, thus violating fundamental rights which were enshrined by article 226 of the constitution.
Destroying the petition cannot be maintained, the court said he was a busy person who had approached the court only for publicity.
“Even though the applicant was warned that he could not waste the court time by submitting a reckless petition, he repeatedly made the same submission, which was contrary to common sense,” the judges said.
The judges say that because the registry right finds that the petition cannot be maintained, they are returned three times.
However, the applicant, who is not sure, has quoted all court assessments related to Habeas Corpus petitions and insisted at hearing, because the cases were heard.