Thiruvananthapuram: After going through a detailed assessment of running almost 250 pages in the case of rape of nuns, prosecution was studied to focus on the fact that survivors have been discredited on small differences in various unacceptable statements and judgment really missed the context.
Based on at least seven points from the assessment, the prosecution has decided to appeal, where the final legal opinion is awaited, the source of the Top Police Department.
“Judgment seems to have given the color of approval for actions that have not even been raised by the defendant.
Also, small changes in deposition are temporary credibility signs that are versions such as parrot that must be discarded.
That is the principle adopted by the APEX court.
The court seems to have failed to appreciate the facts This, “said the source.
After a detailed analysis of the decision at the police level, public opinion is that all prosecution witnesses have been discredited as unreliable about small and not reasons.
acceptable.
“For example, the explanation was given by PW2 (a nun and witness) to his superiors to avoid the disciplinary action to work with the investigation.
To escape from his church, he gave a reply where he said that he gave a statement about the pressure from the police and him It may not continue.
It has been used to conclude that he is a unreliable witness.
The situation in which he gave the letter to be appreciated, “added the sources.
Social backgrounds of nuns and contexts that cause different expressions on their experience are also not valued, felt.
“Approval must be firm verbal or non-verbal for sexual acts and it must be proven by the defendant.
Traveling by car or participating in a function is not approval with long distance opportunities.
Instead it should be seen as his fate,” said the source.
Investigation of supervisors and Kottayam SP Day Sankar has been opened openly on the decision to quote that a sincere explanation in connection with the delay and aspects of fiduciary relations with the defendant and the impact on the mental state of the victim was not valued by the court.
Other officers who analyzed the verdict had also given the opinion that the court had accepted that the defendant was the highest authority over the survivors and had the power to influence his life.
In such circumstances, the inability to fight or delay reporting, etc., is quite natural.
“This must be seen in the context.
Judgment has fully skipped the context,” said the source.
The Top Brass police also expressed a surprise that there were no rules submitted by prosecution in the argument found in the assessment.
Missed Judgment Context: prosecution
