Mumbai: It is possible for the first example in the city, the Special Pocso Court on Thursday charge Rs 5,000 in a mother who has given a “no objection” statement for the alleged release of the rape of her daughter who is suspected of being guaranteed.
The child was “married” to be accused and pregnant.
Observing that the mother has abused the domain of the state authorities, the court said, “The informant (mother) of this problem after once filed a serious brilliant against the defendant, now gave objections to guarantee immediately after the arrest after the arrest of the accused allegations …
so when the court decided To guarantee the defendant, I think it must be given subject to the cost of being paid by the informant to the state.
“The court said the defendant would be released to carry out RS 30,000 personal bonds.
Meanwhile said the facts found during serious investigations, it was reasonable, “…
at the same time it is clear that the practical investigation is complete, so this court argues that keeping him behind bars without purpose is no point in.
Using”.
Not aware of my girl, youth fall in love: Momore Court said the release was subject to payment of Rs 5,000 by Mother to the country.
The mother in the request said this problem had “settled peacefully” between them and she did not want to continue with this case.
He also said he had previously not realized the defendant and his daughter “fell in love”.
The defendant said all the charges made against him were wrong.
He sent photos that showed that they were very close.
Fir it was submitted on July 23 after the mother complained to the police.
The prosecution had opposed Plea guarantees with reasons of teenagers captivated and suppressed by the defendant before he was kidnapped.
It was then submitted accused of being married to one woman and lived with another girl.
The prosecution said the defendant seemed to get used to committing the crime.
The thought of being accused of being able to force Minor witnesses and others if released.
Impressive conditions on the defendant, the court said, “He will not contact, meet, threaten, or cause damage to informants, victims and family members in any way.” (The identity of the victim has not been revealed to protect its privacy according to the direction of the Supreme Court about cases related to sexual violence)