Mumbai: eight people, including the principal, teacher and pekumun from the city school, have received clean chit in the case of sexual harassment of a student, with the Special Pocso Judge Bharti Kale said, “Pocso law has been put in place for that particular reason to protect children Children from sexual violence and abuse cannot be permitted.
“Four of the defendants were women.
Receiving a summary report-B police covered a case where the students mischieved that he was sexually attacked by them at the principal’s office when he went to collect his transfer certificate, the court observed “one swipe to think that if there was no CCTV footage, the defendant would be asked To go through prosecution of serious violations under the protection of children from the sexual violation law.
The Timescarve’s responsibility lies in the Investigation and Court, especially in cases related to sexual violations.
Investigation Authority.
Must maintain a good balance between taking steps Steps to arrest the defendant on the one hand and ensure that people are not framed and required unfairly on the other side.
Those who mistakenly involve people must be punished, because such accusations can destroy career and life.
The police must do a thorough probe to remain Gkan false implications of innocent people “.
Make sure innocent does not have to face the trial, influence the whole life: Judgec who influences a thorough investigation, the judge says innocent people do not have to be done to undergo trials and investigations because their whole life is mentally affected, physically and financially.
.
The father previously submitted several police complaints against the school authority who accused corruption.
Judges are increasingly observing that probe agents and courts must be vigilant.
“The court must protect the interests of all parties involved to ensure that innocent people are not harassed and violators are punished,” said the judge.
The court showed that CCTV footage truly falsified the Father’s case.
It was said four of them accused of sitting or carrying out other activities when the alleged incident occurred.
“The victim will soon be seen experiencing sexual violence.
The complainants have made very serious charges against the principal, teacher and school week.
There is a background of the previous dispute.
None of the witnesses stated that the alleged incident occurred.
Next, no There were found in cellphones respondents as guessions, “said the judge, added that while the Father might have complaints against the school, he had to take another way to solve it.
“I found that the police had collected the right material by carrying out a thorough investigation and did not seem to be biased.
I did not find benefits in complainant disputation (father) and remember the material in the note,” said the judge.
The father alleged that on June 27, 2018, when the child went to the female school head room, he did sexual abuse.
It further accused that the child shouted for help but nothing advanced.
The father also said who was accused of being sexually too harassed him.
Allegedly that while a woman’s teacher showed a refuse video, the other filmed it and he was later threatened by the principal.
Father went to the police on the same day and pine registered.
The police recorded underage and other statements from school.
Minor is sent for medical examinations.
The police told the court that from the statement, CCTV recordings and other materials, the complaint was wrong and the ‘B’ summary was sought.
The B-summary report was submitted when police found the case to become wrong or when there was no evidence.
Looking for rejection of a summary report B, the Father submitted a detailed reply that the police who investigated this case were bribed, therefore, a false investigation was carried out.